Director Of Income Tax G)Gmption)G)Gmption v. Vishwa Jagriti Mission
High Court
21 Dec 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Director Of Income Tax G)Gmption)G)Gmption v. Vishwa Jagriti Mission
Date of order
21 Dec 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Director Of Income Tax G)Gmption)G)Gmption v. Vishwa Jagriti Mission, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE IIIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Reserved on: 20'h Seplember, 2012Dale of Deci.sion: 21" December,2012
t
+trA 773/2010+rTA775l20t0+rTA775l20t0
ftTA 1092/2010
+ITA 1101/2010
-rITA 1103/2010+ITA 1104/2010+rTA ttt2/20r0+rrA 1124/2010+ITA 1104/2010+rTA ttt2/20r0+rrA 1124/2010
TAX G)GMPTION)G)GMPTION).. .AppellantThrough: Mr. Sanjeev Rajpal, Sr. Standing Counselwith Mr Karan Chauhan. Advocate.
DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX G)GMPTION)G)GMPTION)
Versus
VISHWA JAGRITI MISSION
MISSION RespondentThrough: Mr. N. K Poddar, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Rajender Singhvi, Mr. Amit Aggarwaland Mr. Anurag Dubey, Advocate forapplicant/ interveners.
CORAM:MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHATMR. JUSTICE R.V. EASWAR
R.V. EASWAR. J.
For detailed order see ITA 754/2010
llrilll
illll" -\.rr.--, ['](R.V.EASWAR)JUDGE
DECEMBER 21, 20l2/hs
(S. RAVINDRA BHAT)JUDGE
ITA Nos'77 3 12010, 7'7 5 12010, 10921 2010. I I [0 ]l/20 I 0,I 103/2010. 1 104/2010. rrl2l20r0 & rr24l20r0
Page I of I
* II\ TIIE HIGII CO{JR.'[' OF- DEX.IIX [,A'F ][NtrW ] .[,L{tr]
Rcserved on; 20"' ,\cplcmber", [2012]Date of Dectston; 2 I''' I)cc<:tnbar, 20I2
+ nTA 754/2010 & C.M. AFFI-" No.15650/2012+ \TA7731201,0+ \TA77512010+ ltTA 1092/20tr0+ nTA 1n01/2010+ nTA 1X03/2010+ ltTA 1104/20X0+ ltTA. 111212010+ nT.A 1124120tr0
DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX [(EXEMPTION) ]AppellanlThrouglt: Mr. Sanjee v Ra-ipal, Sr. [Standrng]Counsel with Mr. Iizrran [(llratrhan.]Advocate.
Versus
VISHWA JAGzuTI MISSION
MISSION ResporrtlcntThrough. Mr. N. I(. I'oddar, Sr'. Adv. wrth [ML.]Ralender Srnghvi, Mr. Anut Agganvaland Mr Auturng Drrbcy, Aclvocatc [{irL]applicant/ intetvenci's
r I COR,AM:MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA. [tsX{A.T]MR, JUSTICE R.V. [EA.SWAR]
R..V. EASWATT, J.
These are nine [appeals, ][all ][filed by ][Cornnrissiotrer ][of ltrcottre'l'ax ][(Cl'l') ][trrrclcr]section 260A of [the ][Income ][Tax ][Act, ][1961 ][('Act', for ][short) ]['fwo ][sLtbstitttltal]
ITA Nos 1 5412010,'t1312010,'71 [512010' 109212010, ][t ][I0l/20 ][l0']Pasc l o['221103/2010. 1104/2010, [lll2l20l0 ][&117412010 ]
questions of law were [frarned ][by ][this Court ][ot ][21 ][11 ][2011 ][rn ][l'l'A ][Nos ][75412010]773/2070 anJ 77512010. [which ][are ][as ][follows ][-]
"(l) IWtether the Inconte Tax Appellate [Ti'tbund ][hct.s' ][ctt'ecl ][itt]condoning delalt in .filing of [the ][applicalron ].fbr [regrstraliotr ][ttnc{ar]Section I2A/ 12AA [of ][the ][Income ][Tax ][Act, ][19617]
(2)
't4lhether lhe order passed b-v the Ti"rburral rs' lterverse'/"
2 In the other appeals, [the ][following ][colnlnotr ][substanttal question of-lau'rryas]frarned otr the sante [daY ][-]
"Wethet'the Incorne Tax Appellale Tr'fiutml was nght [irt ]sellrrtg [cr.;rc{a]the order passed. by the [Directctt' General ][of ][the ][ltrccttrtc ]['l-ctr](Exemplion) under Secfion [263 ][of ][the ][Inconte ][Tax ][tlcl, ][19617"]
questions of law were [frarned ][by ][this Court ][ot ][21 ][11 ][2011 ][rn ][l'l'A ][Nos ][75412010]773/2070 anJ 77512010. [which ][are ][as ][follows ][-]
"(l) IWtether the Inconte Tax Appellate [Ti'tbund ][hct.s' ][ctt'ecl ][itt]condoning delalt in .filing of [the ][applicalron ].fbr [regrstraliotr ][ttnc{ar]Section I2A/ 12AA [of ][the ][Income ][Tax ][Act, ][19617]
(2)
't4lhether lhe order passed b-v the Ti"rburral rs' lterverse'/"
2 In the other appeals, [the ][following ][colnlnotr ][substanttal question of-lau'rryas]frarned otr the sante [daY ][-]
"Wethet'the Incorne Tax Appellale Tr'fiutml was nght [irt ]sellrrtg [cr.;rc{a]the order passed. by the [Directctt' General ][of ][the ][ltrccttrtc ]['l-ctr](Exemplion) under Secfion [263 ][of ][the ][Inconte ][Tax ][tlcl, ][19617"]
3 Two separate orders [were ][passed ][by ][the ][Incoure ][f ax ][Appellate ]['[riburnal, ][Dclhi]Bench ['I' ]The first order is dated [06 ][05 ][2009 ][ancl ][was ][passed ][in ][Il'A ][\lo:; ][3052.-]3054lDel/2008 which order [is ][challenged ][by ][the ][Itevertue ][in ][l'fA ][Nos ][7521, ] [aml]775 of ZOIO The second [order ][of ][tire Tribunal ][was ][passed ][on ][10 ][01 ][2009 ][in ][I'fA]Nos 1653-1658tDell2)09 [This ][order ][was ][passed ][by ][the ][Tribunal in tlie ][appeals lrled]by the assessee against [the orders ][passecl ][by ][the ][Director of ][lncolrle '['ax ][(Excnrptions)]under section 263 of [the ]Act [The ][Tribunal followed its ][first ][order ][dated 06 ][05 2009]a1d allowed the appeals [of the ][assessee ][In ][the ][first ][order, ][the'Iribunal ][helcl ][1lra1 ][the]assessee was entitled [to ][registration uuder ][section 12A ][and sectiort 80G ][of ][the ][Act ][iirlcl]that the delay in [makir-rg ][the ][application ][for ][such ][registration ][was cotrclotrecl Thts ][was]the orcler passed by the [Tribunal ][in ] [No 3054/Del/2008, ][which ][rvzrs ][thc ][trtattt]appeal by the assessee [and ][consequently ] [Nos.3052-3053/Del/200U ][wer ][c]disrnissed as infructuous.
It would be, therefore, appropriate [to ][refer][ to ][the ][circutnstances ][uttder ][whtclt]the assessee filed the [appeal before the ][J'ribunal ][rn]IIA No 3054lDell2008, rn otder tcrappreciate the controversy irt perspective
5. The assessee was incorporated [as ][a soclety ][on ][l0 ][05 ][1993 ][tttrdcr ][llte ][Soctcttes]Registration Act, 1860 Under [the mernorandum ][of ][assoctatlon execuled, the ][assessec]claimed itself to be charitable institution It filed an applicatron in Form No l[)/\seeking registration under section 12L(a) of [the ][Act ][fiorn ][the ][date ][ol'its ][tnccpLtou ][t ][c]fi om 10 05 1993 This application [was ][filed with ][the ] [(IJxempl ][ion) ][on ] [9 ][12 ][2O0'.t]'Ihe application was accornpanied by the audrted balance sireet aud ac;cttultts lbr llrcfirrancial years ending on 31 03 2004 and [31 03 ]2005 The [assessce ][also ][fllcd ][an]application for grant of approval [under ][section BOG(5)(vr) ][of ][tl're ][Act ][ott ][tlte ][satne ][ilay]ie. 19 122005 in Form No [10G ][under ][Rule ][llAA ][otthe ][lnoonte'fax ][l{Lrles, ][1962]An application for condonation of delay in seeking approval under sectiotts l24 [arril]80G was filed on 14 03 2006 whrch [was accompanied by the ][following docutrctrts ][-]
(a) A note of the charitable activities [carried on ][by the ][iLssessecs](b) Analysis of the financial accounts of [the ][assessee ][f ][or ][the ][financial ][ycar:;]2002-03. 2003 -04 and [2004-05,]
(") Copies of the returns of [income ][of ][the ][assessee ][tn ][Fortti ][No ][1A ][ibr ][the]assessment years [2003 ]-04,2004-05 [and ][2005-06,]
(a) A note of the charitable activities [carried on ][by the ][iLssessecs](b) Analysis of the financial accounts of [the ][assessee ][f ][or ][the ][financial ][ycar:;]2002-03. 2003 -04 and [2004-05,]
(") Copies of the returns of [income ][of ][the ][assessee ][tn ][Fortti ][No ][1A ][ibr ][the]assessment years [2003 ]-04,2004-05 [and ][2005-06,]
6 The applications were scrutinized [by the ] [(Exemptions) ][and ][sLrflic:e ][to ][trole]that he fould certain [irregularities in ][the receipts ][issued ][by ][l.he ][asscssee According ][1o]him, the receipts containecl [a ][reference ][to ][a certificate ][said ][to ][have ][bccl't tssttcd ][ott]31 03.2003 under section 80G [to ][the ][effect ][tliat ][donations ][to the ][assessec ][werc ][eutrtlccl]to tlre exemption for [the period ][frorn 0104.2003 ][to ][3l ][03 ][2005 ][l{e ][hacl ][the ][t'cc;crpts]verified by the assessing officer [having ][jurisdictiorl ][over the assessee ]['l'lic ][assesslnp.]
officer reported that the assessee had [never ][filcd ][any ] [elurtts ]of [inc:otttc ][srtttrc]inception. It would appear that thereafter an applicalron [[br ][registratlott ][Ltttclct ][scc:ttou]BOGwas subrnitted by the assessee on21 [12 ]2005 and [an ][applicatron ][lor ][condonaltotr]of the delay in subrnitting the application [was ]also filed [l'he ][returns ]ol'incotle [rvoulcl]also appear to have been filed claiming exemptiou [under ]section I of tlte [Ac:l ][rtr]respect of the entire income of the assessee - society on [the ground ][that ]it [had ][applrecl]for registration under section 12A
7 Subsequently, the DIT (Exemptions) seems [1o ]have found [that the ][assesscc ][lracl]issued certificates under section 80G for collection of donations {.bl thc [pertorl]0l 04 2001 to 31 03 2003, these certificates of approval rvele fouud [no1 ]1o have becrrissued by the income tax authorities Based on thrs serious [irregulartty ]tlrc [DI'l'](Exernptions) sought an explanation fi-orn the assessee Several otlter partrc:r.rlat s rver-calso called for such as the names, addresses and PAN nuurbers of the douors, tlrc [tnocle]in which the donations were received, etc l-lte assessee was also callcd uporr luexplain the reasons for not fihng the retul'trs of tncome on a legular basts evett tlttirrgltno registration under section 12A was granted The assessec respon(led by a lcttcrdated 17.03 2006 the gist of wirich was that the financial matters [ancl ]tax [rclatcd ][rsslros]were being dealt with by its erstwhile lreasurer A K Srkri, Chartered Accountanl [rvho]had since ceased to work for the sociely and [that ]the [asscssee ][had ][tnade ittqurries ][Ir'ont]hiur, tlrat lre had informed the society that ["due to ][c'erlcrrn ][lopses ][l.t.1t ][lrts suborclttrula,t]lhe d.ocuruenlatiott is not adequale" and that ["he ][ha,s ][lalrerr ][apprrlprrale ]s'le1n:/ [r ][ettrt'tlrc.s]ht thrc regard' With regard to the failure to submit the [r.cturns ]of iuconrc, [tlrc]assessee gave a sirnilar explanation
8 The DIT (Exernptions) was not satrsfied with the [assessee's ][rcply ][arrd ][lre ][rrracle]further queries in relation to certain receipts tssued [by the ][atisessee {i.rr ][donattotrs ][lrr]response to this quely the assessee subrnitted [a ][detarled ][reply ][dated 26 05 ][2006 ]['l'hrs]letter is reproduced in paragraph12 of [the ]first order [of the T'ribunal ][and ][ts, ][lltct'clirt'e,]
8 The DIT (Exernptions) was not satrsfied with the [assessee's ][rcply ][arrd ][lre ][rrracle]further queries in relation to certain receipts tssued [by the ][atisessee {i.rr ][donattotrs ][lrr]response to this quely the assessee subrnitted [a ][detarled ][reply ][dated 26 05 ][2006 ]['l'hrs]letter is reproduced in paragraph12 of [the ]first order [of the T'ribunal ][and ][ts, ][lltct'clirt'e,]
not reproduced here. lt [is sulllcient to ][note ][that ][the ][assessee ][placed ][tlte ][tespttttsrbrlity]for the irregularities [in ][the ][receipts and the ][tax ][related ntalters upon ] [I( ][Stl<r ][r ]['l'lrc]assessee explained [that on ][cotning ][to ][know ][of ][the ][rolc ][played ][by ] [I( ][Stkrt' ][att]executive committee [meeting was ][iinmediately ][convened and ][in that ][rneetitrg ][Siltrr ][hacl]ir-rformed the assessee [that ][he ][in ][turn ][relied upon ][his ][cnrployee ][otre ][Vishnu ][Prasad ][ttr]assist him in the [assessee's ][tax ][related ][matters and ][that on coming ][tO ][litlow ][llrat ][lrrs]employee had not [discharged tire ][rvork ][entrusted ][to ][hirn properly, ][he had ][filed ][a Poltcc]cornplaint seeking initiation [of ][action ][against ][Vishnu ][Prasad ]['l'hcse lacts ][tvcre]confirmed by Sikri [in ][writing ][and ][he ][also appended ][his ][signatureto ][the ][nrirtt-ttcs ][ol'thc]meeting ip proof thereof [The ][assessee ][further pointed ][out that ][it ][had ][loclgccl ][a]complaint with the [police ][against ][Sikri ][in ][December, ][2005 ][and ][itl ][trupport ][of thc lact. ][a]copy of the cornplaint [was ][enclosecl ][with ][the ][assessee's ][letler ][It ][was ][f ][urther ][sLtbttttllcd]that the executive [comrnittee ][normally ][entrusts drfferent ][luncltons ][to ][dr{I'ercrrt ][ofllcc]bearers/ executive [members and relies upon thern ][for ][the ][proper dischalge ][o['thosc]functions, as would [happen ][in ][any ][organisation ][It ][was ][subrnitted ][lirrtller ][that ][all ][thc]donations were [properly ][accounted ][for ][As ][regards ][the tton-sttbtnissiott ][ol'the ][tetlttl'ts]of income, it was [pointed out that ][for ][the ][assesstnettt ][years ][2001-02 ][and ][2002-0-l ][llre]returns were sent through [speed ][post ][while ][those ][relating ][to tltc ][assessntcttt ][yczrt ][s]2OO3-04 to 2005-06 [were ][filed on21 ][022006 ][lt ][was explained ][that ][as soott ][as ][1he]assessee came to know [of ][the ][lapse ][it ][realised ][that the erstwhile treasuler ][(A ][l( ][Srlc'r)]had failed to [discharge ][his ][functions ][properly ][and also ][did not ][apprtse ][llte ][cxccrt-tlivc]committee members [about ][the ][lapse and, ][therefore, ][his ][scrvices ][wcre teruttttatcd ][atlcl]steps were taken to [cornply ][with ][the ][filing ][of ][the ][returns ]['fhe ][zrssessec ][also ][cxPlatnecl]that these developments [constituted suffrcient ][cause ][fcrr ][thc ][delayccl ][{'iling ][o[' ][thc]for [approval under ][sections ][12A ][and ] [and ][that ][the ][DI'l' ][(ExcrnPtions)]applications ought to have [condoned the delay ][and ][accorded regrstration.]
l)agc 5 o1.22
l)agc 5 o1.22
9 The DIT (Exemptions) [refused ][to ][grant registration ][to ][the ][assesscc-socicll' I'lc]for [the ][refusal. ][The rnain ][reasons ][were ][that ][the ][activitres ][o1'llre]gave several reasons assessee - socibty were [not ][genuine, that ][the ][assessee ][had ][forged ][tlte ] [ccrtiflcatcs,]that the assessee had [also ][fa.ked ][the ][cerlificate granting exletlsiott ][of ][registration ][uttdct]section 12A for the [period ][01 04.2005 ][to ][31 03 2008, ][that no ][sr-rch ][ccrtrllcale ][ltas ][trectt]issued to the assessee by [the ] [(E>remptions), ][that ][the ][assessec ][did not ][subtntt ][atty]particulars relating to the [donations received on the ][basrs ][of ][alleged ccrltl'tcales ][tssttecl]under section 80G, [that simply by taking ][the plea that ][the ][soctety was ][clepenrlerrl ][on]A I( Sikri, its erstwhile [treasurer, ][it ][cannot rvash ][off ][its ][hands ][fi'om the ][rllcgaltty]cornmittecl by it, that [the conduct ][of ][the society since ][inception ][had ][to ][bc ][l<cpt ][ltr ][ttttttci,]that it was inconceivable [that the failure ][to ][apply ][lor ][approviil/ ][r-egrstralitttt ][ttttdcr]section IZA and section [was ][not ][within ][the l<nowledge ][o1- ][the govcrtirrlg body ][til']the society, that it [was ]only [after ][being ][cornered ][that the ][assessee ][canle ][ionvzrt'd ][ttt]February, 2006 to file [the ][returns ][and ][in ][these ][ciroutnstances ][the ][zlsscssec's]explanation for the [inordinate delay cannot ][be ][accepted ][The ] [([rxcnrptions)]furlher observed that it [was ][part ][of ][the ][duty ][of ][Lhe ][treasurer ][under the ][tnentot-ittlclr-tttt]and articles of [association ][to ][present ][the ][accour-rts ][in ][the ][monthly ][tncetitrgs ][ol ][thc]committee for approval [and ][this ][would ][clearly ][show tlrat ][he was ][l<ccPing ][the]'ranaging comrnit1ee ilformed [about ][the financial ][matters, ][that at ][any rate ][no ][pcrsoll:ll bcnelll]accrued to the [treasurer ][by ][delaying ][or ][not perfornring his ][duties and that ]["tltc ][lrtltrlrl.T']of fhe circumstances [aS ][discussetJ ][abotte ][and ][rn ][lhe earlrer ][pm'dgt ][o1ilts 'tlttn"s ][llrul]lhese activrties could nol [hat.,e ][conlutued ][(^,er' ][o ][penod of ][vtr:h a lottg ][lrtttc ][t't'ltL:rt ][lltt:]lmowledge of [the ][mentbers ][of ][the ][mcu'mgtlg conttrtrllee/ ][got,ernirtg ][ltttclst " ][ittlcl],,hatting regard to otterall. conduct of the applicant ancl lhe lotctLillt rtf'crt'ct.utr,sltttrc'e.v,the argument [put ]forv,ard [regarding ][ils ][ltono ]frdes [cuttttol ][be ][accepled' ][lior ][tlrcsc]reasons the DIT [(Exernptions) held ][as ][follows ][-]
,,5.Invteluofthedetaileddiscussionsmthe.foregoiltgpdlogt.upl.t's
and rn the totalitlt [of ][the ][circunr.sl,cutces, ] [Lutt ][t'tol ][sali.s.fied ][abtntl ][lhc']
1T
of [fhe ][octivties ][of ][the applicctrrl ][.soc'iely ][T'lte|c.frtrc, llrc]genumeness apphcant socinq,'S [request.for regtslrafictrt ][tr/s ][I2rl ][t,s ][re.1ccletl.]
6. Smce I ltat,e [refused ][lo ][gt'anl ][regrslralrort ][lo ][llte ][LlPpliL'(utl]society vtrlhilz [lhe ][nteaning ][oJ ][l2AA(l)(b)ft1 of ][the ][ltrcctnre-ttx ][At't,]I96l, I do [nof consider ][fi ][appropriale ][lo ][adludtcole ][on ][Ils ][reque'\'t.fa']condonatron.for [delay ][in.fil,ing ][a?tphcaltctn ][tnforrtt ][Mt.l0A ][fot'grctrrl ][rt/]registrattotr u/s I2A [of ][the ][Income-lax ][Acl, I96I ]['"]
,,5.Invteluofthedetaileddiscussionsmthe.foregoiltgpdlogt.upl.t's
and rn the totalitlt [of ][the ][circunr.sl,cutces, ] [Lutt ][t'tol ][sali.s.fied ][abtntl ][lhc']
1T
of [fhe ][octivties ][of ][the applicctrrl ][.soc'iely ][T'lte|c.frtrc, llrc]genumeness apphcant socinq,'S [request.for regtslrafictrt ][tr/s ][I2rl ][t,s ][re.1ccletl.]
6. Smce I ltat,e [refused ][lo ][gt'anl ][regrslralrort ][lo ][llte ][LlPpliL'(utl]society vtrlhilz [lhe ][nteaning ][oJ ][l2AA(l)(b)ft1 of ][the ][ltrcctnre-ttx ][At't,]I96l, I do [nof consider ][fi ][appropriale ][lo ][adludtcole ][on ][Ils ][reque'\'t.fa']condonatron.for [delay ][in.fil,ing ][a?tphcaltctn ][tnforrtt ][Mt.l0A ][fot'grctrrl ][rt/]registrattotr u/s I2A [of ][the ][Income-lax ][Acl, I96I ]['"]
10 Against the aforesaid [order ][of ][the ] [(Exemptions), ][tlte ][assessee ][lllcd ][an]appeal before [the Tribunal ][and ][raised ][several ][contentions ][which ][were ][all ]"u'',*1,1stodby the Tribunal [which ][upheld ][in ][principle ][the ][right of ][the ] [(l3xemptions) ][lo ][lttoh]ir-rto the activities of [tlie ][trust ][including ][the ][forged ][certillcates ][rvhilc ][grantrrrg]It [held that the ][trust ][and ][the ][trustees ][were ][indcpendent ][and ][1hc ][acts ][o1'tltc]registration trustee cannot be that [of ][the ][trust ][unless ][they ][are enacted ][wrth the iuvolvemetrt of ][othcr]trustees Eventually, [the ][Tribunal by ][order dated ][15 5 ][2O0l ][held ][asr ][utrdcr ][-]
"80. Thus it was necessary .for [lhe ][l.d. ][DfT' ]@,) [l0 ][extrrtrrttc ][lltul]' whether other members of Gotrcrning Bodlt v,cre ulso [tnvttlvccl ][rtr]obtctining .fake [certrftcates ][or ][lhe.y ][were ][m ][llte ][lotowlarlge ][llttrl ][lha]certtficaies are fake' Individuul [acln'tl)t ][of ][a ][lrtstee ][ot' ][d ][ttrt'rtthet']ccntnot be lertnecl lo [lte the ][aclitti\t ][of ][lhe ][lrusl. ]['l'he ][lartguage ttsed ][rrr]lhe prot,ision [of ][section ][l2AA ][re.fers ][lo ][getrurneness ][of ][lhc ][aclrttrltes ][o/]the trusl or mstilution [and ][not ][lo ][lhe actntrlres ][ctf ][cm ][irrdtviducrl ][lrttslce.]IJ'aryt nusctppt'oprratron [is ][made ][lhal ][v,rll ][be ][only ][a ][breaclt ][o.f ][lt'rts'l ][ort]lhe part of that [parficui,ar ][truslee. ][Tlttts ttt ][oLtr ][vtev) ][rl ][tttct.s ][ttece't,\ot'.))]for.^fhe "were [drc ][1n1 ][to ][exannine ][thal ][aspect ][a.s ][all ][lhe relcvattl ][ttrolat'trtls]placed. before hnt. [Wfthoul ][exammtng ][he ][catnro( ][clrov' ][tr]presuitption thit other [rnentbers ][of ][lhe ][Got'ertung ][Bodv tvu'e ][ol's'rt]mt,olved. In the [circuntslances ][y/e ][con,vder ][tt ][1t.tsl anL{ ][propar ][lO]reslore thrc rcsue [to ][the ]file [of ][DIT ([,) ][to ][exan',nne lht's' rssue 1t'operl.1t]and after ntaking [t)errrtcafion ][irt ][lhts ][regard pass ][att ][orclcr ][tr/,s ][I2tlA ][tr.s]per prot)tsrons of [latu' ][We ][du'ecl ][accordmgly']
BI. so as it relales [lo ][condctnalion ][of ][delay, ][1r1. ][1il7'(l:') ][hu,s ][ttttl]decujed [(hts ][tssue ][andhis ][observatrcln ][m this regot'd ][cottlturted ][ttt p(ItLl]l7 of the [mtpugned ][order ][whch ][l'tus ][alreadl' ][beert ][rept'othtt:cd rrt ][llte]abotte part olnis [order. ][lk ][tto ][not.filul ][any.forc:e ][rrt ][llte ][cottlctrlrorr ][of]the Id. Ai that [cottdonalrrn ][qf ][4ela1t ][s'hould ][be ][c'il'tLlet'cd]
1TANos75412010.11312010,7'7sl20l0,I}92l2olo,ll01/2010'
aulomalicalllt [g"anled as lhere ][is ][no speahng ][ordu' ][tn ][lhs ][regcrrd ][b.1']the lrl. DIf @) He [has ][not ][consitlered ][thrs ][rssue. ][After ][exutttrtritrg lhc]issue of genuineness of [actruities ][as djrecled abot'e, ][lcl. ][DI'I'(E) ][wrll]also coniider lhe [issue ][regardtng ][cortdonatir,tn ][ctf'deloy ][otr ][rnaril.Y ][turd]pass a speaking order [on this ][issue. ][we ][dtrect ][ctccr.trclrtrgly."]
1TANos75412010.11312010,7'7sl20l0,I}92l2olo,ll01/2010'
aulomalicalllt [g"anled as lhere ][is ][no speahng ][ordu' ][tn ][lhs ][regcrrd ][b.1']the lrl. DIf @) He [has ][not ][consitlered ][thrs ][rssue. ][After ][exutttrtritrg lhc]issue of genuineness of [actruities ][as djrecled abot'e, ][lcl. ][DI'I'(E) ][wrll]also coniider lhe [issue ][regardtng ][cortdonatir,tn ][ctf'deloy ][otr ][rnaril.Y ][turd]pass a speaking order [on this ][issue. ][we ][dtrect ][ctccr.trclrtrgly."]
11 pursuant to the aforesaid directions of the Tribunal, the DIT [(Exemptrotrs) tooli]up the proceedings afresh [FIe ][called upon ][the ][surwiving trustees ][and ][rccorded ][thetr]submissions [and ][aiso ][examined one ] [Mansinghka ][rvho ][was ][the ][dotlot. ][rvho blcw]tlie whistle by intimating [the income ][tax ][department ][that ][the receipts ][issued ][to ][hirrr try]the assessee contained [false ][ceflificates ][under ][sectiotrs ][l2A ][and ][80G ][Aficl ][trll]examination of [all ][the ][issues ][afresh ][as ][directed ][by ][the ][Tribunal the ][Dl'f ][(Flxcrnptiotrs)]arrived at the following [conclusiorts ][-]
(a)It is not acceptable [that ] [I( ][Srkrr, ][Treasuuer ][rvers ][solely ][lespotrsible ][fc,l]theforgery of the [certificate ][uuder section 80G,]theforgery of the [certificate ][uuder section 80G,]
Thestatement of [Sikri ][recorded on ][20 ][10 ][2005 ][does ][not ][match ][rvith ][the](b) subsequentpolice complaint and confessiou [ol'Sikri ][to ][the ][Chain-rlatr ][(.)1- ][lhe]society
(c) There is no evidence [to ][shorv ][the exclusive itrvolvetnetlt ][of ][Siltlr ][ttr ][tllc]forgery or to show [that ][the ][other ][members ][of ][the ][socicty were ][tlot ][itlvolveil]There is circumstantial [evidence ][to ][suggest ][that ][ol,her ][tlleurbers ][of ][the ][st)crcly]were also involved
Because of the [involvement ][of ][several tnetnbers ][of ][the socicty ][in ][the](d) of [the certificates, the ][assessee ][caunot be considered ][to ][be catryrl.lg ][()ll]fOrgery a charitable [activity, it ][was ][actually carrying o1 ][a ][criminal ][activity]
(") The delay in filing [the ][aplthcation ][for ][registration ][uucler ][scctions ][12,^']and BOG cannot [be condoned ][because ][it ][was ][or-rly ][after being ][corucred that thc]
I
assessee came up [with ][the ][defence ][that the ][responsibility ][for ][thc ][allegecl]forgery of the certificates [lay ][at the ][doors ][of ] [I( ][liikrr, wlticlt ][was ][trol ][att]acceptable or reasonable [explanation, ][the ][assessee ][was also ][involvecl ][ttl ][llte]forgery and, therefore, [its ][plea ][for ][condonation ][of ][the delay ][cantrot be acceptcd]
IZ In fine, the DIT [(Exemptions) concluded ][that ][registratiou under ][section ][l2A]cannot be granted and the [delay ][in ][filing ][the ][applicatron cattnot ][be ][ct-ttrcloltccl]Consequently the claim for [certificate ][of ][exenption under ][sectton ] [rvas ][alstr]reiected. This order was [passed ][on24 ][9 2008]
13. It rvas against [the ][aforesaid order ][of ][the ] [(Exernptions) ][that thc ][asscsscc]preferred an appeal to the Tribunal [in ] [No ][3054/Del/2008 ]['['he ]['l'riburlal ][exatrttttetl]the facts and the submissions [in ][great detail ][frorn ][paragraphs ][30 ][to ][104 ][of'lhe]impugqed order dated [06 ][05.2009 ][In ][these paragraphs ][the eulit'e ][sequeltoe ][ol-cvctrts]was marshalled cogently [and ][the ][rival ][subtnissions have ][beert ][elaborately ][aclvertccl to]ilcluding the authorities [cited ][by ][both ][the ][sides ][Ultirnately ][Lhe ][lindings ][ol' ][thc]'fribunal are contained in pagaraphs 105 to 124 of the irnpugned orclcr .r\ perusal olthese paragraphs shows [that the ][Tribunal ][has ][recorded the ][follorving ][findings ][-]
13. It rvas against [the ][aforesaid order ][of ][the ] [(Exernptions) ][that thc ][asscsscc]preferred an appeal to the Tribunal [in ] [No ][3054/Del/2008 ]['['he ]['l'riburlal ][exatrttttetl]the facts and the submissions [in ][great detail ][frorn ][paragraphs ][30 ][to ][104 ][of'lhe]impugqed order dated [06 ][05.2009 ][In ][these paragraphs ][the eulit'e ][sequeltoe ][ol-cvctrts]was marshalled cogently [and ][the ][rival ][subtnissions have ][beert ][elaborately ][aclvertccl to]ilcluding the authorities [cited ][by ][both ][the ][sides ][Ultirnately ][Lhe ][lindings ][ol' ][thc]'fribunal are contained in pagaraphs 105 to 124 of the irnpugned orclcr .r\ perusal olthese paragraphs shows [that the ][Tribunal ][has ][recorded the ][follorving ][findings ][-]
(a) In the earlier order of [the ][Tribunal ][dated ][2lt ][05 ][2O0l, ][it ][rnrtrs ][hclcl ][that]the DIT (Exemptions) [should ][examine ][whether ][the ][other ][tttetrtLrcrs ][ol- ][tlre]governing body of the assessee - society [were ][involved ][in the alleged ][lirrgery,]etc. or not. This order [became ][final, both ][parlies ][having ][accepted ][thc ][sattte]
(b) The trust as an entity [and ][the trustees ][or ][thc ][luentbers ][ol- ][the govcrrltng]body, as individuals, [have independent extsteuce ][and ][lhey ][have ][zr ][fitlLrciary]relationship with [eacli other ][based ][on ][the ][assumption ][ol ][borrer.fclc ][lrehavtottt]A crirninal act of a [trustee ][or ][member ][of ][the ][governing ][botly ][carltlol ][bc]attributed to the trust [which ][is ][an ][independent ][entlty ][lfowcver, ][tlte ][postttotl]may be differelt if it [is ][found that ][the ][trustees ][or ][metnbers ][of'the ][g()vcrrrrng]
@
body had colluded [or ][were conniving ][with ][each ][other ][ancl ][using the trust ][as ][a]plalforrn to advance [their ][r"refarious ][agetrda ][In ][such ][a ][case ][tlte lrust ][woulcl]equally be resPonsible
The facts and the [sequence ][of ][events ][right fionr ][the ][beginnitlg ][cliscloscd](") that the trustees [or the ][members ][of ][the goveruing ][body ][rvere ][trot trtvolvcd ][ttr]the alleged acts of [illegality ][comrlrtted ][by ] [i( ][stkri, ][who ][altinc ][rvas]responsible for them.
(d) The trust itself [appeared ][to ][be ][a ][victim ][of ][the ][mishanclling ][of ][thc]responsibility entrusted [to ][A.K ][Sikri.]
(") All the nonies [were properly ][accountcd ][fcrr ][arrd ][dr-rly ][aplllictl ][firt]charitable [purposes]
There is no [question ][of ][any ][collective responsibility ][utlder whrch ][thc](0 trust could be liable [to ][answer ][for ][the ][irregularities ][or ][illegalitres ][allcgcr-liy]committed by K [Sikri ][since ][all ][these are ][attributable to hirn in ][his ][individual]capacity
(g) The DIT (Exemptions) [has ][failed ][to ][establish ][thal ][the govcrning ][boclv]members or other [trustees ][were acting ][in ][collusion ][with ] [I( ][Srliri ][lt ][rvas ][tttl]individual act of [Sikri, ][not ][attributable ][to ][the ][assessee]
Forthe above [reasons ][the ][Tribunal ][held that ][the'society ][was etrtitled ][to ][gct ][rcgisttatiott]under sections [12A ][and ][BOG, ][however, ][it ][was held tlrat ][the ][authorities rvoulcl be ][[l'ee to]examine the application [of ][funds ][in ][conformity ][with ][the ][objects ][of ][the trr:st ][in ][lhe]assessment [to ][be ][made ][under ][tl-re ][Act ][Since ][there ][were sufficieut ][reasons ][lor ][the ][clelzry]in filing the [applications ][for ][registration, ][it ][was ][held ][that the ][delay was ][condotrecl atltl]tlie trust should [be ][granted ][registration from inception]
Forthe above [reasons ][the ][Tribunal ][held that ][the'society ][was etrtitled ][to ][gct ][rcgisttatiott]under sections [12A ][and ][BOG, ][however, ][it ][was held tlrat ][the ][authorities rvoulcl be ][[l'ee to]examine the application [of ][funds ][in ][conformity ][with ][the ][objects ][of ][the trr:st ][in ][lhe]assessment [to ][be ][made ][under ][tl-re ][Act ][Since ][there ][were sufficieut ][reasons ][lor ][the ][clelzry]in filing the [applications ][for ][registration, ][it ][was ][held ][that the ][delay was ][condotrecl atltl]tlie trust should [be ][granted ][registration from inception]
14 While narrating the sequence of the [events ][leading to the ln-est ][of A ][I( ][Stkt'r,]the Tribunal took note of the [genesis ][of ][the ][entire affarr ][whic;h ][started ][fi'ottt ][thc]cornplaint lodged by M P Mansinghka Charities [Trust ][of ][Mumbai ][lntmedial.cly ][on]receipt of the complarnt, the assessee convened [a ][tneetiug ]of [its ][governirrg ][body ttt ][t{s]head office at Delhi in which Sikri [was ][present ][His ][explanatiott was ][tlrat ][hc ][lrail]applied for exemption ceftificates [in ][the normal ][course ][of ][his worlt, ][relyrng ][ott ][ltil;]office accountant (Vishnu Prasad) The [accoumtant ][was ][absconding ][ancl ][accotcling ][to]Sikri an FIR had been lodged with [the police ][for ][taking ][action ][Shkr-i ][also signed ][thc]minutes of the meeting in which [these ][facts were appareully ][recorded ]['l'hc ][gcnclal]body appointed a committee consisting of Sikri [and ][Dev ]Ral [I(ataria, the ][Gctreral]Secretary to enquire into the matter On 15 0l [2006, ]Sikri wrote a [lctter ]to [tlte]Chairman that as Treasurer [he was responsible ][for ][all ][the accouttting ][and ][tax ][mitttct ][s,]tliat he was following up the issue about [the ][forged registration ][cer.titlcales tvtl"lt ][tlre]income tax authorities and a private agency [was ][appoirrted ][(by ][him) ]to [asc:cflain ][lltc]wlrereabouts of the erring employee. [Sikri ][submitted ][a report on ][28 ][022006 ][to ][lhe]Chainnan of the society [that the ][fake ][certificates ][rryere ][procured ][by ][his ][ernploycc]which was submitted by him (Sikri) ir-r turn to the society IIc [acccptccl ][nrorzrl]responsibility and prornised to regularise [the ][tnatters ][and ][tendered ][hrs ][apology ][to ][lltc]trust He sought for some time to [enable ][him ][to ][interact ][rvith the ][incotrte ][tax]department to prove his bonafide and correct the iristakes [He ][ttttdet'toolt]responsibility for getting the society [into trouble, ][including ][crinrinal ][proceedtngs ][-l-he]trust found these replies of Sikri [to ][be ][evasive ][and ][filed ][a poltce conrplaint ][rvith ][the]SHO, Nangloi Police Station, [New ][Delhi on ][17 ][03.2006 ][In ][this ][complatrtt ][thc ][soctety]stated that apart frorn Sikri, [one Radhey ][Lal ][Gupta could also be ][ittvolved ][Lloth]Radhey Lal Gupta and Sikri [were removed ][on ][04042006 ][On ][this ][day ][a ][[iesh]cornmittee consisting of five [members ][was ][constituted ][to ][eltquit'e ][inlo ][the ][tnatler]Apprehending further [proceedings, ][Sikn ][filed ][another ][complaittt ][against his cnrploycc](Vishnu Prasad) witl-r the SHO, Pitampura, Delhi [narratttlg ][in ][detail ][as 1o ][horv ][hc]
entrusted the work [to ][hirn ][and ][how ][he ][later on ][calne ][to ][know that ][evett regtrlat' ][tax]returns l-rad 1ot beel [filecl, ][etc ][In ][this ][police ][cor-nplair-rt ][also, ][accorcling ][to ][llrc]Tribur-ral, Sikri acoepted [the forgery ][of ][the cefltficates ][and ][the notr-lilrng ][of ][tltc ][lax]returns, which [were ][duly ][prepared ][by him ][and handed ][ovet'to ][the entployec ][lbr ][Irling]with the income tax [department ][Pressure ][started ][to ][build ][on ] [ikri ][both ][frorn ][1 ][he ][tr ][trst]and from the [police ][and ][he ][was ][forced ][to ][file ][another ][corr-rplaint ][utrder secttotr ][156(3)]of the Criminal [Procedure ][Code ][on ][29 ][04 ][2006 before ][the ][Clrief' ][Metropolitarr]Magistrate, Rohini [District ][Court ][The ][complatnt was ][accompanied ][by ][cvtdettce ][IIt]support thereof He [pointed out ][that the police ][had ][not ][registered ][ltis ][oont;rlartrts]though they disclosed [cognizable offenscs and prayed ][fbr ][a direction ][tirat ][tltc ][polic:c]should register [the ][FIRs ][ancl ][proceed ][with ][the ][investrgatiotr agattlst hts ][enrployce ]['l'hc]police authorities then carried [out ][an ][investigatron ][atrd ][subnttttcd ][a ][tcpott ][ott]28.05 2OO1 thatthe particulars [of ][the employee, ][as ][given ][by ][Silcri were ][itlcotnplctc ][attcl]that in the absence of [any ][evidence ][regarding ctnployrnetrt ][o[ ][tl-re ][absconclitrg ][pcrsL)lr,]Sikri hinself was [responsible ][for ][the ][alleged ][irregr,rlarities On ][3 ] [05 ][2007 ][Sikr ][r]himself was examined by [the ][Kirti ][Nagar Pohce Station, ][Dclhi ][in ][relatiotr ][lo ][lill{]No 605/2006 filed by [the ][incorne ][tax ][authorities ][on ][31 ][1Z ][2006 ][repor.ting ][firrgcry ][o{']the certificates of [registration under ][sections ][12A ][and ] [In ][the ][statetucnt ][givctr ][ltr]tlre police on 31 [05.2007, ][Sil<ri gave ][the ][same ][explatration, ][natnely, ][the ][entrustrlcrrl ][ol-]the work of filing [the ][applications ][for ][approval ][uucler scctror)s ][12A ][arrd ][B0(i ][and tlrc]filing of the income [tax ][returns ][to ][his ][employee ][FIe also ][statecl ][that ][it ][rva:; ][ltts]ernployee who had [given ][the ][certificates to ] [Gtrpta, tlre ][Frcsideut ][of ][llrc ][asscl;sec ][-]society for further action [Radhey ][Lal ][who ][was ][also examined ][by ][thc ][Kirti ][Nagnr]police confirmed the statement of Silcri On29 02 2.008 a report [was suburitted try ][tlre]police i' the Court of [the Metropolitan Magistrate, ][Roirini ][to ][thc effect tlrat ][Sikri ][rvas]rnaking false staternents [and ][a ][prayer ][was ][made ][that ][actton ][under sectiott ][1Bl, ][Incliart]perral Code may be taken against hirn. Prtor thereto, on 2l II2001, [on tlte ][basis ][o[-]tlre crimilal cornplaint [No ] [B7OI20O1filed ][by the ][assessee ][on 28 06 2006 ][in lhe ][(loutt]
llti
of ACMM, Rohili [coufts, Delhi ][an ] [was registeled ][agarnst ][siltri ][aucl ][lte ][was]arrested by the [police ][He ][remained ][in ][custody ][till 26.I22001 ][ln ][the ][tneallttttrc ][ott]27 lI.ZOOT he filed [a ][bail ][application ][uncler ][section 437 ][of thc Cr ] [aud ][evctt ][in ][this]bail application, [he reiterated ][his ][earlier ][stand ][that ][he aloue was responsiblo ][(irr ][the]controversy, through [his ernployee. ][He ][also ][stated ][that no ][other trttstec was ][involved]in the conttoversy [Eventually Sikri ][passed ][away ][in ][2011]
llti
of ACMM, Rohili [coufts, Delhi ][an ] [was registeled ][agarnst ][siltri ][aucl ][lte ][was]arrested by the [police ][He ][remained ][in ][custody ][till 26.I22001 ][ln ][the ][tneallttttrc ][ott]27 lI.ZOOT he filed [a ][bail ][application ][uncler ][section 437 ][of thc Cr ] [aud ][evctt ][in ][this]bail application, [he reiterated ][his ][earlier ][stand ][that ][he aloue was responsiblo ][(irr ][the]controversy, through [his ernployee. ][He ][also ][stated ][that no ][other trttstec was ][involved]in the conttoversy [Eventually Sikri ][passed ][away ][in ][2011]
15 The above facts [and ][the ][sequence ][or ][chronology oIevenl-s ][havc bectt ][discr-rssed]in paragraph l0g of [the order ][of ][the ][Tribunal ][The ][Tribgnal ][has ][optlted ][ttl ][llatagralllt]l l0 that these facts [cannot ][be ][bruslied ][aside ][or ][oalled self-servrng ][thcts ]['l'ltc ][cvttlcttcc]in the form of [statement ][of ][A.I( ][Sikri, ][minutes ][of ][the ][mcetttrgs, ][cottrlllattrt ][to ][thc]police autfiorities [(both ][by ][the ][assessee ][atid also ][by ][tlie ][incotre tax ][clcpattt'e1t),]i.vestigatiol by [the police ][and ][therr reports, ][proceedrngs ][before ][tlte crintttlal ][coutts,]the bail application [of ][Sikri ][on the ][basis ][of ][which bail ][was ][granted ][to ][ltitn ][at'c all]evidence, according [to ][the ][Tribunal, ][to ][show the ][cornplicity or invglvcuet'rt of ][Srhri ][irr]the alleged forgery [or ][irregularities ][in ][the ][issue ][of ][the ][certificates ][of'registral"it-rrr/]approval under [sections ][12A ][and ] [Accordir-rg ][to ][the'lribunal, ][the ][cviclcttcc]contained Court [proceedir-rgs ][and ][were ][complementaty ][to ][eaclt ][ollrer ]['fltey ][rvcrc]contemporalleous [and cannot be brushed aside ][as ][the ] [(Exernptions) ][has ][dottc, ][as]having evidentiary [value ][The ][eir.tile ][docutnentary ][eviderlce ][was ][pt'esctltccl ][bcforc]'o the DIT (Exemptions), [the ][police ][authontics and ][the ][crintirtal ][cottt'1s ][atttl ][lltett]cannot [be ][impeached, accorcling ][to ][the ][Tribr,rnal ]['l'l.re l'r'ibr-nrztl, ][tltcrcitrr.c']credibility held that the DIT [(Exemptions) ][was not ][justified ][r1 refusing ][to ][tzrl<e ][cogtttzrttcc ][trl']those vital documents [in ][corning ][to ][the ][conclusion ][that the ][asscssee ][- ][socicty ][ot- ][tts]trustees/ [governing body merrbers connived ][or ][coiludecl ][wilh ][Srltr-i ]['['hc rcl|acttott ][ol']A K. Sikri on [which ][reliance was placed ][by ][the ] [(Exenlptions) ][ltas ][Lrcctt ][hclcl ][lry]the Tribunal in [paragraphs ][111 ][and ][112 ][of ][its ][order ][as ][iraving ][been ]["sttdclcttl)' ][trtatlo]that too when [he was removed ][from ][the ][trust ][and ][the police ][hacl ][already ][ttnpltcitlecl]
hirn alleging that he was fabricating s1ories". ['l'he ][T'ribr"rnal ][has ][also ][hclcl ][that ][Srl<r.r ][clrcl]not succeed in demolishing his earlier statements given not only [to ][the trust ][bttt ][also to]the police and the Courts and also in his bail application on the basis ol'whtclr he rvasreleased from police custody
hirn alleging that he was fabricating s1ories". ['l'he ][T'ribr"rnal ][has ][also ][hclcl ][that ][Srl<r.r ][clrcl]not succeed in demolishing his earlier statements given not only [to ][the trust ][bttt ][also to]the police and the Courts and also in his bail application on the basis ol'whtclr he rvasreleased from police custody
16 Questioning [the ][correctness ][of ][the vierv taken ][by ][tire ][Triburnal ][it ][is ][contcnclcLl]by the learned standing counsel for the Revenue that the l'ribunal wetrt wr.ong in rtsappreciation of the evidence and in exonerattng tlte assessec - society [artcl ][1hc]members of the governing body from any [guilt ][or ][cuipability ][11 ][is ][contcttclecl ][that ][arr]overall appreciation of the sequence of events and ihe evidence would sr"rggcst thalthere was cgllusion between AK Sikri and the [assessee ]- soctety [in ][the rvhole ][a{lhrr]It is pointecl out that Sikri did not stand to [gain ]or [beneflt ][by ][the ][alleged acls ][o[']illegality, forgery, etc and that the ultimate beneficiary of'such acts was only thcassessee - society and this crucial aspect has been nrissed by the'I'ribLrnal Accordiugto l.lie learned standing counsel, Sikri [could not ][have had ][any nrotive ][for ][indulgrng ][in]such acts except onthe prompting or directions [of ][the metnbers ][of ][the ][govcrntng ][bocly]oftheassessee-society. Attentior-risaiso'drarvutothelactthatlhervholea[]att [c:tnte]to light only because of the complaint [of ]M [Mattsinghlca'lrust ][of ][Mtrnrbat ][lt ][rs]vehemently contended that Sikri [was ]only [acting ][as ][an ][employce ][i ][e ]['l'reasurcr o1'tltc]society without ally personal motive or benefit [and ]it ls wrong ou the [part ][o{'thc]Tribunal to have concluded that [the society ][itself ][was ][a ][victiu-t ][of ][the ][fraud allcgedly]cornmitted by Sikri
17 On the other hand, it was subrnitted on [bel-ralf ]of [the ][assessee ][- ][socicty ][tlral ][rt]took prornpt action on [receipt ][of the ][notice ][fronr ][the Advocate ][of ][M l' ][Manstttghlta]Trust of Murnbai in [Decemb.er,2005 ][until ][whrcli time ][it ][was ][totally ][LlllAwtlre ][o[-llrc]lapses and irregularities comr.nitted [by Sikri, ][tl'rat ][the applical.ion urade ][for ][regtsttittttttt]of tl.re society under section llA(a),on [l9 ][122005 ][was ][sigtred ][only ][by ][Sil.r'i ][arrd ][all]this came to light [in the ][course ][of ][the proceedings ][of the executive body ][n'rectrrrg ][held]
i
17 On the other hand, it was subrnitted on [bel-ralf ]of [the ][assessee ][- ][socicty ][tlral ][rt]took prornpt action on [receipt ][of the ][notice ][fronr ][the Advocate ][of ][M l' ][Manstttghlta]Trust of Murnbai in [Decemb.er,2005 ][until ][whrcli time ][it ][was ][totally ][LlllAwtlre ][o[-llrc]lapses and irregularities comr.nitted [by Sikri, ][tl'rat ][the applical.ion urade ][for ][regtsttittttttt]of tl.re society under section llA(a),on [l9 ][122005 ][was ][sigtred ][only ][by ][Sil.r'i ][arrd ][all]this came to light [in the ][course ][of ][the proceedings ][of the executive body ][n'rectrrrg ][held]
i
on 28. 12.2005 [on ][receipt of ][the notice ][fi ][om ][the Advocate of ] [P. ][Mansinghka ]['l't'usl]It is submitted that [Sikri ][was present ][in ][the ][meeting ][and ][conl'essed ][to ][the ][trregrrlariltes]and even signed the minutes [of ][the meeting ][which ][recorded ][tlte ][r:onfesstcrtl ][ol' ][Stl<rt]reiiance [is ][placed on ][the findings ][and ][observations ][of ][the TribLrnal on tlre ][basts]Strolg of the chronology of [events ][starting ][fiorn ][the application ][made ][on ][19 ][122005 ][ttndcr']the sig'ature of Sikri [upto ][the ][date ][of ][his ][release ][on barl ][inclucling ][the ][stnleurctrts tttadc]by him to the [police, ][to ][tl-re ][crirninal courts ][and ][in ][his ][bail apphcatiotr ][Or-tr ][attettttotr]was also drawn to [the ][fact that ][even ][in ][the ][contplaittt ][tuade ][by ][the ][ttlcollle ][lax]authorities on 3l Lz.z0o6 [in ][FIR No ][605/2006 ][with ][the ][l(rrti ][Nagar Policc ][Stattott,]they had implicated only [K. ][Sikri ][and ][not ][any ][of ][the ][trustees ][or ][governtttg ][bocly]members of the [assessee ]- [society ][by ][name ][Frour thrs ][it ][ts ][subttritted ][by ][thc ][lcartrctl]counsel for the [assessee, ][that ][it ][was clear that ][the ][income ][tax ][aul.horitics ][llterrtsclrrcs]looked upon the AK Sikri [only ][as ][the ][person ][r.esponstblc ][for thc ][{irlse/ ][[irrgccl]certificate and all other [irregularities/ ][illegalities ]Quitc [apatl ][[r'otrt ][tlte ][a[-rove ][.]submitted the learned [counsel ][for ][the ][assessee, ][the question ][of ][concloualiot'r ][OI-clcltty ][otr]the ground of sufficient [cause ][for ][the ][delay was a ][discretion conferred ][upott ][tltc ][Cottt-t]a1d it can be interfered with [only ][if ][it ][was shown ][to ][have ][beett exerrcised ][in ][a ][pe ][rvcl ][sc]manner and so long [as ][the ][discretion ][is ][shown ][to ][have been ][exercised ][propcrly ][arrcl]having regard to [the entire ][conspectus ][of ][the facts ][ar-rd ][crrcuutstattces ][o{'tlte ][casc ][itrtd]o. the application of [the relevant principles ][of ][law, ][and ][so ][lottg ][as ][tlte ][t-elevattt ][firt:ts]have not been ignored or [irrelevant facts have ][not ][influetrced ][the ][discrction. ][the]court [acting ][under ][section ][260L ][of ][the ][Act ][should ][not ][intcrlero ][rvith ][lhe]appellate decision of the lower court [It ][is ][further ][pointed ][outthatthe ][question ][of ][llerversity ][was]not even raised by [the ][Revenue ][in ][the ][metnorandutn ][of ][appeal and, ][therelolc, tllclc]was no substance [in ][the ][appeals In ][support ][of ][these ][submissions relrance was ][Placecl]on several autl'rorities [compiled ][in the ][form ][of ][a ][paper-book]
l8 The main question that [falls ][for ][our consideration ][is ][trrhether ][the I'ribunnl ][was]justified i' condonipg the delay in [the ][filing ][of ][the ][application ][for ][registratiorr ][rurclct]section 12A of the [Act ][and ][whether the ][view ][tahen ][by ][the ]['l-r.ibunal ][is pel'verse ]['l'hc]question whether there was [sufficient ][cause ][for ][the delay ][is ][always ][a questiott ][of'lhcl]as has been held by [two ][Division ][Bench judgments ][of ][this ][Court ][(t) ][C-l7- ][v. ][l'crt'rtrtt]Nand, (2004) 266 ITR [255 ][and ][(t1) ] [t,. ][ITOC.HU ][Cot'prtrotron, ][(2004) ][268l1'l\ ][172]The Tribunal has, in [an ][elaborate order in ][which ][all the ][facts ][and ][the ][rival ][sttbnrissitlrts]have been taken into [consideration, ][held that tirere was ][sufficient ][causc ][for ][lhc ][dclay]on the part of [the ][assessee ]- [society ][in ][rraking the ][applications ][for ][tegistratiorr ][t-tttclcr]section 12A and [80G ][of ][the ][Act ][lt ][is not ][necessary, ][not ls ][it ][proper, ][lor ][us ][to ][dccicle]the culpability or otherwise [of ] [I( ][Sikri ][wiro ][was ][the ][Treasurer ][of ][thc ][assessce]society. All that [we ][need ][to ][examine ][is ][whether the ][Tribr-rnal ][had ][valtcl ][tttalcrtals]before it on the [basis ][of which ][it ][could ][have ][reasonably ][corne ][to ][the ][conclustotr ][1lta1]the assessee - society [was ][prevented ][by ][sufficient ][caLlse ][in ][applyrng ][lirr ][thc]registration in tirne [It ][is ][manifest ][from ][a ][fair ][reading ][of ][the order of ][the'l'ribunal ][that]it had weighed the [circumstances ][in ][which ][the ][.assessee ]- [society was ][placecl atrd the]action it took immediately [on receipt ][of ][the complaint ][from ] [Mansinghlta ]['l'rust]of Mumbai, it has [referred ][to ][the ][confession ][of ][Sikri in ][the meeting ][o1'tire govel'nlt)g]body owning up [responsibility ][for ][having ][r-nisled ][the assessce ][socrcty ][I'v]that [the ][necessary ][application ][for ][registration ][rvere made ][itt ][tttttc" ][it ][has]representing also referred to [the action ][taken ][by ][the ][assessee ]- [society ][against ][Srhli ][rvhen ][it ][lbLrnd]that Sikri was nottaking [adequate steps ][to ][remedy ][the situation, ][it ][has ][also tefcrt.cd to]tlie police complaints [filed ][not only ][by ][the ][assessee ]- [society ][against ][Sil<rr, ][btrt ][also ][1tr]the complai't filed [by ][the ][income ][tax ][authorities against ][!'iil<ri ][whrch indicalctl ][tlrat]they also viewed [Sikri to ][be ][responsible ][1br ][the
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.