Case LawHigh Court › Director Of Income Tax, (International T...

Director Of Income Tax, (International Taxation)–Ii, New Delhi ……… v. M/S Presision Energy Services Limited ………

High Court 01 Apr 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · ukhcucis_pg
Parties
Director Of Income Tax, (International Taxation)–Ii, New Delhi ……… v. M/S Presision Energy Services Limited ………
Date of order
01 Apr 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Director Of Income Tax, (International Taxation)–Ii, New Delhi ……… v. M/S Presision Energy Services Limited ………, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.

Decision: 31 of 2013 (Director of Income Tax (International Taxation)-II, New Delhi versus M/s Seacor Offshore Dubai LLC), decided on 20[th] March, 2014 and, accordingly, these appeals are also disposed of by answering those issues in favour of the appellant in the present appeals.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Income Tax Appeal No. 20 of 2013 Income Tax Appeal No. 25 of 2013 Director of Income Tax, (International Taxation)–II, New Delhi ……….. Appellant Versus M/s Presision Energy Services Limited ……….. Respondent Income Tax Appeal No. 26 of 2013 Director of Income Tax, (International Taxation)–II, New Delhi . ..…….. Appellant Versus M/s Siem Offshore AS ……….. Respondent AND Income Tax Appeal No. 27 of 2013 Director of Income Tax, (International Taxation)–II, New Delhi ……….. Appellant Versus M/s Siem Offshore Inc ……….. Respondent Present: Mr. Hari Mohan Bhatia, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. P.R[. Mulick, Advocate for the respondent. ]Coram: Hon’ble Barin Ghosh, C.J.Hon’ble V.K. Bist, J. BARIN GHOSH, C.J. (Oral) The issues raised in these appeals were issues in Income Tax Appeal No. 31 of 2013 and the questions arising out of those issues have been answered in favour of the appellant in Income Tax Appeal No. 31 of 2013 (Director of Income Tax (International Taxation)-II, New Delhi versus M/s Seacor Offshore Dubai LLC), decided on 20[th] March, 2014 and, accordingly, these appeals are also disposed of by answering those issues in favour of the appellant in the present appeals. It shall, however, be open for the assessees to take such recourse to law as is available to them in relation to non-completion of the hearing by the Tribunal and associated matters. (V.K. Bist, J.) (Barin Ghosh, C.J.) 01.04.2014 01.04.2014 P. Singh
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan