Case LawHigh Court › Director Of Income Tax (International Ta...

Director Of Income Tax (International Taxation), Kolkata v. M/S. Abn Amro Bank Nv

High Court 22 Nov 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Director Of Income Tax (International Taxation), Kolkata v. M/S. Abn Amro Bank Nv
Date of order
22 Nov 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Director Of Income Tax (International Taxation), Kolkata v. M/S. Abn Amro Bank Nv, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Decision: The appeals stand disposed of and the substantial questions of law are left open.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
O-140 & 141 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL JURISDICTION (INCOME TAX) ORIGINAL SIDE ITA/19/2012 DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), KOLKATA VS. M/S. ABN AMRO BANK NV ITA/33/2012 DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), KOLKATA VS. THE ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND BEFORE : THE HON’BLE JUSTICE T.S. SIVAGNANAM And THE HON’BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA Date : 22[nd] November, 2022 Appearance : Ms. Smita Das De, Adv. …for the appellant in ITAT 19 of 2012. Mr. Smarajit Roychowdhury, Adv. …for the appellant in ITAT 33 of 2012. Mr. Asit Kr. De, Adv. …for the respondents. The Court : We have heard the learned standing counsel appearing for the appellant/revenue and the learned counsel for the respondent/assessee. Learned counsel for the respondent/assessee submitted that the assessee has availed the benefit of the “Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme” and Form V has been issued recording the same. The appeals stand disposed of and the substantial questions of law are left open. (T.S. SIVAGNANAM, J.) (HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.) s.pal/SN.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan