Director Of Income Tax (International Taxation), Mumbai v. In The Light Of Circular
High Court
02 Aug 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Director Of Income Tax (International Taxation), Mumbai v. In The Light Of Circular
Date of order
02 Aug 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Director Of Income Tax (International Taxation), Mumbai v. In The Light Of Circular, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Digitallysigned bySHRADDHASHRADDHAKAMLESHKAMLESHTALEKARTALEKARDate:2022.08.0512:08:15+0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 6788 OF 2010
Director of Income Tax (InternationalTaxation), Mumbai Vs.M/s. Navin Gems, Mumbai ****Mr.Suresh Kumar for appellant.Mr.Atul K. Jasani for respondent.
.. Appellant.. Respondent
CORAM : DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR AND ABHAY AHUJA, JJ.DATE : 2[nd] AUGUST 2022
PC :
1.Learned Counsel for the appellant states that the tax effect inthe present Appeal is below the limit stipulated in terms of CircularNo. 17 of 2019, dated 08[th] August, 2019. It is stated that noinstructions have been received from the Department to withdrawthe present Appeal.
2.In the light of Circular No. 17 of 2019, the Appeal is disposedof as involving low tax effect.
3.However, we observe that in case, the Revenue fnds for somereason that the Appeal was not supposed to have been withdrawn inthe light of the Circular, it would be open to the Revenue to fle anapplication, seeking restoration of the Appeal, to be decided on itsown merits. Refund of Court-fees as per rules.
[ABHAY AHUJA, J.]
[DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, J.]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.