Director Of Income Tax (International Taxation), Mumbai v. The Andhra Valley Power Supply Company, Mumbai
High Court
21 Dec 2010 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Director Of Income Tax (International Taxation), Mumbai v. The Andhra Valley Power Supply Company, Mumbai
Date of order
21 Dec 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Director Of Income Tax (International Taxation), Mumbai v. The Andhra Valley Power Supply Company, Mumbai, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 2.In this view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1452 OF 2010
Director of Income Tax (International Taxation), Mumbai..Appellant.
Versus
The Andhra Valley Power Supply Company, Mumbai..Respondent.
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant.Mr.Dinesh Vyas, Senior Advocate with Mr.Ajit Shah & Sri Hari for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &
R.M. Savant, JJ.
P.C. :
DATE : 21[st] December, 2010.
1.Counsel for the Revenue states that the questions raised in this appeal are covered against the Revenue by the decision of the Apex Court in
the case of Commissioner of Income Tax V/s. H.E.G. Limited reported in (2010) 324 ITR 331 and the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Income-Tax Officer V/s. Delhi Development Authority reported in (2001) 252 ITR 772.
2.In this view of the matter, the appeal is dismissed with no order
as to costs.
(R.M. Savant, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue