Director Of Income Tax (International Taxation v. Argoma N.v
High Court
26 Feb 2010 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Director Of Income Tax (International Taxation v. Argoma N.v
Date of order
26 Feb 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Director Of Income Tax (International Taxation v. Argoma N.v, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Time to remove office objections is extended by a period of four weeks from today, failing which the appeal shall stand dismissed for want of prosecution without any further reference to the Court.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3617 OF 2009
ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.367 OF 2008
Director of Income Tax (International Taxation)
Versus
Argoma N.V.
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant.Mr.Sumeet Raghani i/by PDS Legal for the respondent.
CORAM : Dr.D.Y. Chandrachud & J.P. Devadhar, JJ.
DATE : 26[th ]February, 2010.
P.C. :
1.The notice of motion is taken out for restoration of an appeal which stands dismissed for non-removal of office objections pursuant to a conditional order dated 15[th] June 2009. In our view, the interests of justice would require that the appeal be restored to file subject to payment of costs. We find that conditional orders for removal of office objections are not diligently complied with by the Revenue, as a result of which the appeals are not numbered and remain pending for admission. In these circumstances while in the present case we are restoring the appeal, we do so subject to payment of costs quantified at Rs.1,500/- to be paid to the respondent. The payment of costs shall be a condition precedent and shall be effected within a period of two weeks from today. Time to remove office objections is extended by a period of four weeks from today, failing which the appeal shall stand dismissed for want of prosecution without any further reference to the Court.
2.The notice of motion is made absolute. There shall be no order as to costs.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
(Dr.D.Y. Chandrachud, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.