Case Law › High Court › Director Of Income Tax (International Ta...

Director Of Income Tax (International Taxation v. M/S Sedco Forex International Drilling Inc. ...………

High Court 19 Sep 2013 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · ukhcucis_pg

Parties

Date of order

19 Sep 2013

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Director Of Income Tax (International Taxation v. M/S Sedco Forex International Drilling Inc. ...………, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Considering the said judgment, we refuse to admit this appeal even without notice to the respondent and, accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Income Tax Appeal No. 30 of 2013 Director of Income Tax (International Taxation). .………. Appellant Versus M/s Sedco Forex International Drilling Inc. ...………. Respondent Mr. H.M. Bhatia, Advocate for the appellant. JUDGMENT Coram: Hon’ble Barin Ghosh, C.J. Hon’ble U.C. Dhyani, J. BARIN GHOSH, C. J. (Oral) We have been informed by the learned counsel appearing in support of the appeal that the matters in issue in the present appeal have already been dealt with by a Division Bench of this Court in Income Tax Appeal No. 10 of 2010 [Director, Income Tax (International Taxation), Delhi-II, New Delhi vs. Sedco Forex International Drilling Inc.] and other connected matters, rendered on 30[th] July, 2012. 2. Considering the said judgment, we refuse to admit this appeal even without notice to the respondent and, accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. G (U.C. Dhyani, J.) 19.09.2013 (Barin Ghosh, C. J.) 19.09.2013

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.