Director Of Income Tax (International Taxation v. M/S Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling Inc
High Court
03 Sep 2013 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · ukhcucis_pg
Parties
Director Of Income Tax (International Taxation v. M/S Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling Inc
Date of order
03 Sep 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Director Of Income Tax (International Taxation v. M/S Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling Inc, the High Court (2013) decided the matter.
Decision: The appeal is, accordingly, disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITALIncome Tax Appeal No. 14 of 2013With
Delay Condonation Application No. 7855 of 2013
Director of Income Tax (International Taxation).
.………. Appellant
Versus
M/s Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling Inc.
..………. Respondent
Mr. H.M. Bhatia, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. S.K. Posti, Advocate for the respondent.
JUDGMENT
Coram: Hon’ble Barin Ghosh, C.J. Hon’ble Servesh Kumar Gupta, J.
BARIN GHOSH, C. J. (Oral)
There has been 6 days’ delay in preferring the appeal. An Application for condonation of delay has been filed, which is not being objected to by the learned counsel appearing for the respondent. We have independently considered the averments made in the Application for condonation of delay and, being satisfied with the reasons furnished for the delay, allow the Application.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
3. Our attention has been drawn to a judgment of this Court rendered on 30[th] July, 2012 in connection with Income Tax Appeal No. 10 of 2010 and connected appeals. The issues dealt with in the said judgment are issues in the present appeal. By the said judgment, those issues have been answered against the appellant and, following the ratio of the said judgment, we also decide the issues raised in this appeal against the appellant. The appeal is, accordingly, disposed of.
(Servesh Kumar Gupta, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.