Case LawHigh Court › Director Of Income Tax (It v. M/S. Safma...

Director Of Income Tax (It v. M/S. Safmarine Containers Lines N.v

High Court 17 Jan 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Director Of Income Tax (It v. M/S. Safmarine Containers Lines N.v
Date of order
17 Jan 2013
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Director Of Income Tax (It v. M/S. Safmarine Containers Lines N.v, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Accordingly, both the appeals are dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 952 OF 2011 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 147 OF 2009 Director of Income Tax (IT) ..Appellant versus M/s. Safmarine Containers Lines N.V. ..Respondent -------- Mr. Tejveer Singh for the Appellant. Mr. Porus Kaka, Sr. Adv. with Atul K. Jasani for the Respondent. ............. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR & M.S.SANKLECHA, JJ. DATE: 17[th] January, 2013 P.C. : Income Tax Appeal No. 147 of 2009 is not on board. Mentioned. By consent, taken up for hearing alongwith Income Tax Appeal No. 952 of 2011. 2Common questions of law raised in both the appeals for assessment years 2001-02 and 2003-04 read thus: a)Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the ITAT was justified in holding thatincomefrominland transportation of cargo within India was covered under Article 8(2)(b)(ii) and 8(2)(c) of the tax treaty between India and Belgium and therefore not liable for tax in India? b) Whether Article 8(2)(b)(ii) and 8(2)(c) of the tax treaty between India and Belgium includes within its ambit and activity of inland transportation of cargo from various places within India? 3 The Advocates for the parties state that the issue arising in these appeals stand covered in favour of the respondent-assessee and against the revenue by the decision of this court rendered on 06.08.2012 in ITXA No. 3024 of 2009 in the matter of Director of Income Tax v. Balaji Shipping UK Ltd. In this view of the matter, the questions as raised in the present appeals are not entertained. Accordingly, both the appeals are dismissed with no order as to costs. (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan