Case Law › High Court › Director Of Income Tax v. Columbia Pictu...

Director Of Income Tax v. Columbia Pictures Industries Inc

High Court 09 Jan 2009 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

09 Jan 2009

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Director Of Income Tax v. Columbia Pictures Industries Inc, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2890 OF 2008 ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 2890 OF 2008 Director of Income Tax ... Appellant Versus Columbia Pictures Industries Inc.. Respondent Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the Appellant. Mr.B.V. Jhaveri for Respondent. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO, &R.S. MOHITE, JJ. CORAM: F.I. REBELLO, & R.S. MOHITE, JJ. 9 DATED: JANUARY 09, 200 9 DATED: JANUARY 09, 200 9 DATED: JANUARY 09, 200 P.C. P.C. P.C. . Appeal not on board. By the consent of parties, taken on board and heard forthwith. . The issue which arises in this appeal is similar to what was arisen in I.T.A. (L) No. 2891 of 2008. For the reasons set out in the said order, question of law as framed would not arise and consequently appeal dismissed. (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (R.S. MOHITE, J.)(F.I. REBELLO,J.) (F.I. REBELLO,J.) (R.S. MOHITE, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.