Director Of Income Tax v. Mitsui & Co. Ltd

$~R-6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 558/2009 DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Rahul Chaudhary, Sr.Standing Counsel. versus MITSUI & CO. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Mayank Nagi, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH % O R D E R 12.10.2017 1. This is an appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against an order dated 24[th] December 2008 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal („ITAT‟) in ITA No. 4645/Del/2005 for the Assessment Year („AY‟) 2002-03. 2. While admitting this appeal by the order dated 19[th] August 2009, the following questions were framed by the Court for consideration:- “a) Whether the ITAT was right in holding that the Indian branches/offices of the Assessee company and their activities cannot be regarded as permanent establishment of the Assessee in India and income directly or indirectly attributable to these branches/offices is not taxable in India? b) Whether the ITAT was right in law in holding that the Assessee company does not have any permanent establishment in India and its income from business turnover/imports in India ITA 558/2009 was exempt in view of Agreement for Avoidance for Double Taxation between India and Japan?” 3. In view of the order passed today by the Court in ITA No. 902/2009 involving the same Assessee for AY 2001-02, the aforementioned questions are answered in the affirmative, i.e. in favour of the Assessee and against the Revenue. 4. The appeal is dismissed but, in the circumstances, with no orders as to costs. S. MURALIDHAR, J. OCTOBER 12, 2017 ‘anb’ PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J. ITA 558/2009