Case LawHigh Court › Director Of Income Tax(International Tax...

Director Of Income Tax(International Taxation v. Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank Ltd

High Court 05 Mar 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Director Of Income Tax(International Taxation v. Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank Ltd
Date of order
05 Mar 2012
Assessment year(s)
1997-98, 1995-96
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Director Of Income Tax(International Taxation v. Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank Ltd, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The Appeal is therefore not maintainable and is accordingly dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

ITXA-220 ASN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 220 OF 2010 Director of Income tax(International Taxation). Vs. Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank Ltd. ..Appellant. ..Respondent. Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Appellant. Ms. Prachi Raj Mhatre i/by M.S. Bodhanwala & Co. fort the Respondent. CORAM: DR.D.Y. CHANDRACHUD & M.S.SANKLECHA, JJ. March 5, 2012. P.C. This appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 arises from a decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 14 February 2007; the assessment year in issue in this appeal being 1995-96. The questions of law which have been raised by the Revenue are as follows: 1Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the ITAT was justified in upholding the Order of the CIT (Appeals) in allowing exemption of interest u/s. 10(15) on gross basis? 2Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the ITAT was justified in allowing exemption in respect of gross interest instead of net interest? 3Whether after the insertion of section 14A, any expenditure relating to earning of exempt income can be permitted? 2We have perused the grounds of appeal which were raised before the Tribunal on behalf of the Revenue. Ex-facie the grounds which are now sought to be raised in the present appeal were not grounds taken in the appeal before the Tribunal. As a matter of fact, the issue pertaining to the grant of exemption under Section 10(15) arose in relation to Assessment Year 1997-98. This appeal as noted earlier relates to A.Y. 1995-96 for which the questions of law sought to be raised do not arise from the order of the Tribunal. The Appeal is therefore not maintainable and is accordingly dismissed. (DR.D.Y. CHANDRACHUD,J.) (M.S.SANKLECHA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan