Dismissing The Crlrc As Infructuous v. Ffiu
High Court
11 Sep 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Dismissing The Crlrc As Infructuous v. Ffiu
Date of order
11 Sep 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Dismissing The Crlrc As Infructuous v. Ffiu, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY ,THE TWO THOUSAND
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE [JUSTICE K.SURENDER]
CRIMINAL REVISION [C] [NO: 243][2 ][0F ][2010]
criminal Revision [case ][filed ][under ][section 397 & ][401 ][of ][cr.P.C, ][againsl^the]order dated [28.01 ][.2010 ][pr*i ][in ][CriL,r.p'No' ezso ][of ][2009 ][in C ][C.No ][49 ][of ][2009]on the file of the [court ot ][iriJ"bpu"iri ][jrag" ][for.Economic ][offences ][- ][cum ][- ][Vlll]Additional Metropolitan [Sessions Judge, at Hyderabad']
Between:
The Assistant Commissioner [of ][lncome Tax, Central ][Circle' ][Aayakar Bhavan']N;;; G;b-;i, [Tank, ][Rajahmundry, East Godavari District']
... Petitioner/ComPlainant
AND
1Kotla Venkata Srinivasa [Rao, ][S/o. ][Venkata Ranga ]Bao, [Age:48 ][years. ][occ:]i;;ir*i;;: [Rv;n.r.ro.is-z ][z7' ][VJd,.,,n's", ril;k ][Road' ][Rajahmundry' ][East]Godavari District.i;;ir*i;;: [Rv;n.r.ro.is-z ][z7' ][VJd,.,,n's", ril;k ][Road' ][Rajahmundry' ][East]Godavari District.
...ResPondenUAccused
The State of [Andhra ][Pradesh, Represented ][by ][its ][Public Prosecutor' ][High]Court of Andhra [Pradesh, Hyderabad']Court of Andhra [Pradesh, Hyderabad']
...ResPondent
Counsel for the [Petitioner ][: ][Sri ][Vijhay ][K Punna]
Counsel for Respondent [No.2 ][: ][Public Prosecutor]
Counsel for [Respondent ][No.1 ][: ][None ][appeared]
The Court made [the ][following: ]
II
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER
Crl.R.C No.2432 0F 20LO
ORDER:
l. . Learn e,l counsel appearing for lncomr: TaxDepartmenl, n.ould submit that appeal preferred lgainstthe order of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITA1.) havethe order of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITA1.) havebeen dismiss,ed by this Court insofar as the petitirtner isconcerned. As such, the cause in the present RevisionCase does nct survive for adjudication and has trecomein [ruct uo us.in [ruct uo us.
2. Recordi-rg the said submission the Criminal Rt:visionCase is dismi;sed as infructuous.
r)Miscellaneous petitions, pending if an1,, shall standclo sed.clo sed.
Sd/. T. SRINIVASDEPUTY REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SEC]TION OFFICER
To,
1The Soecial Judqe for [Economic Offences ]- [cum]- [Vlll ][Additional]rr,l"iroo,iritrn [;essidns [Judge ][at Hyderabad' (with ][record.s)]rr,l"iroo,iritrn [;essidns [Judge ][at Hyderabad' (with ][record.s)]2i;; ia;i; tne Public [Pr5secutoi' ][High ][court ][for ][the ][Sta]te of Telangana [at]Hvderabad. [(OUT)]Hvderabad. [(OUT)]J.bil" CC to S [i ][Vilhay ][K. ][Punna, Advocate ] 4.Two CD Copies4.Two CD CopiesNjb/ghY\-'Y\-'
HIGH COURT
DATED:1110912024
ORDER
CRLRC.No.2432 o12010
DISMISSING THE CRLRCAS INFRUCTUOUS
+,84V.,ffiu
.4''z' -,.)...:1i [.,]11ll\. 1.\'1\.L
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.