Case LawHigh Court › Dismissing The Crlrc As Infructuous v. F...

Dismissing The Crlrc As Infructuous v. Ffiu

High Court 11 Sep 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Dismissing The Crlrc As Infructuous v. Ffiu
Date of order
11 Sep 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Dismissing The Crlrc As Infructuous v. Ffiu, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY ,THE TWO THOUSAND PRESENT THE HONOURABLE [JUSTICE K.SURENDER] CRIMINAL REVISION [C] [NO: 243][2 ][0F ][2010] criminal Revision [case ][filed ][under ][section 397 & ][401 ][of ][cr.P.C, ][againsl^the]order dated [28.01 ][.2010 ][pr*i ][in ][CriL,r.p'No' ezso ][of ][2009 ][in C ][C.No ][49 ][of ][2009]on the file of the [court ot ][iriJ"bpu"iri ][jrag" ][for.Economic ][offences ][- ][cum ][- ][Vlll]Additional Metropolitan [Sessions Judge, at Hyderabad'] Between: The Assistant Commissioner [of ][lncome Tax, Central ][Circle' ][Aayakar Bhavan']N;;; G;b-;i, [Tank, ][Rajahmundry, East Godavari District'] ... Petitioner/ComPlainant AND 1Kotla Venkata Srinivasa [Rao, ][S/o. ][Venkata Ranga ]Bao, [Age:48 ][years. ][occ:]i;;ir*i;;: [Rv;n.r.ro.is-z ][z7' ][VJd,.,,n's", ril;k ][Road' ][Rajahmundry' ][East]Godavari District.i;;ir*i;;: [Rv;n.r.ro.is-z ][z7' ][VJd,.,,n's", ril;k ][Road' ][Rajahmundry' ][East]Godavari District. ...ResPondenUAccused The State of [Andhra ][Pradesh, Represented ][by ][its ][Public Prosecutor' ][High]Court of Andhra [Pradesh, Hyderabad']Court of Andhra [Pradesh, Hyderabad'] ...ResPondent Counsel for the [Petitioner ][: ][Sri ][Vijhay ][K Punna] Counsel for Respondent [No.2 ][: ][Public Prosecutor] Counsel for [Respondent ][No.1 ][: ][None ][appeared] The Court made [the ][following: ] II THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER Crl.R.C No.2432 0F 20LO ORDER: l. . Learn e,l counsel appearing for lncomr: TaxDepartmenl, n.ould submit that appeal preferred lgainstthe order of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITA1.) havethe order of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITA1.) havebeen dismiss,ed by this Court insofar as the petitirtner isconcerned. As such, the cause in the present RevisionCase does nct survive for adjudication and has trecomein [ruct uo us.in [ruct uo us. 2. Recordi-rg the said submission the Criminal Rt:visionCase is dismi;sed as infructuous. r)Miscellaneous petitions, pending if an1,, shall standclo sed.clo sed. Sd/. T. SRINIVASDEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SEC]TION OFFICER To, 1The Soecial Judqe for [Economic Offences ]- [cum]- [Vlll ][Additional]rr,l"iroo,iritrn [;essidns [Judge ][at Hyderabad' (with ][record.s)]rr,l"iroo,iritrn [;essidns [Judge ][at Hyderabad' (with ][record.s)]2i;; ia;i; tne Public [Pr5secutoi' ][High ][court ][for ][the ][Sta]te of Telangana [at]Hvderabad. [(OUT)]Hvderabad. [(OUT)]J.bil" CC to S [i ][Vilhay ][K. ][Punna, Advocate ] 4.Two CD Copies4.Two CD CopiesNjb/ghY\-'Y\-' HIGH COURT DATED:1110912024 ORDER CRLRC.No.2432 o12010 DISMISSING THE CRLRCAS INFRUCTUOUS +,84V.,ffiu .4''z' -,.)...:1i [.,]11ll\. 1.\'1\.L
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan