Case LawHigh Court › District Patna v. Commissioner Of Income...

District Patna v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central, Patna

High Court 16 May 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
District Patna v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central, Patna
Date of order
16 May 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In District Patna v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central, Patna, the High Court (2014) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNAMiscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.6444 of 2013 In Miscellaneous Appeal No. 695 of 2008 ====================================================== Ranjana Singh, w/o Sri Bharat Prasad Singh, aged about 55 years, resident of Mahesh Nagar, New P P Colony, PO Kesri Nagar, PS Patliputra Colony, District Patna ……..Appellant/Petitioner Versus 1.Commissioner of Income Tax, Central, Patna 2.Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle -3, Patna .... .... Respondents/ Respondents/Opp. Parties ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Rastogi For the Respondent/s : Mr. Archana Sinha @ Archana Shahi ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 5 16-05-2014 This Application for restoration has been made by the appellant Ranjana Singh. On the facts and in the circumstances, this Application is allowed. The order dated 7[th] October 2013 made in Misc. Appeal No. 695 of 2008 is recalled. Misc. Appeal No. 695 of 2008 is restored on the files of the Registry of the High Court on condition that the appellant will remove the defects within ten days from today. It is clarified that if the appellant fails to remove the defects within ten days as specified, Misc. Appeal No. 695 of 2008 shall stand dismissed for non-prosecution. MJC Application No. 6444 of 2013 stands disposed of in the above terms. mrl (R.M. Doshit, CJ) (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan