Division Bench Judgment Of This Court In Ita v. M/Smitsubishi Electric Automotive India Pvt. Ltd., Manesar, Gurgaon’,Decided On 16.05.2019
High Court
11 Jul 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Division Bench Judgment Of This Court In Ita v. M/Smitsubishi Electric Automotive India Pvt. Ltd., Manesar, Gurgaon’,Decided On 16.05.2019
Date of order
11 Jul 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Division Bench Judgment Of This Court In Ita v. M/Smitsubishi Electric Automotive India Pvt. Ltd., Manesar, Gurgaon’,Decided On 16.05.2019, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
ITA No.2 of 2019 (O&M)
110IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA|AT CHANDIGARH
ITA No.2 of 2019 (O&M)Date of decision : 11.07.2019
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Gurgaon
...... Appellant
VeTSuU
M/s Towers Watson India Pvt. Ltd.
...... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARTHON'BLE MR.JUSTICEHARNARESH SINGH GILL
,,,
Present ;Mr. Tajender K.Joshi, Advocatefor the appellant.
,,,
AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral)
CM06110Cll02019|
For the reasons recorded, the application is allowed. Delayof 137 days in re-filing the appeal is condoned,
Main case
This appeal has been filed under Section 260A of the IncomeTax Act, 1961 (for short ‘the Act’) against the order of the Income TaxAppellate Tribunal, Mumbai Bench “K”, in SA No.444/MUM/2017(arising out of ITA No.1140/MUM/2015) dated 06.10.2017 for theAssessment Year JO1O-2011.
At the very outset, counsel for the appellant-revenue has veryfairly accepted that the issue is covered against the Revenue by a
Division Bench judgment of this Court in ITA No.78 of 2019 titled as5The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Gurgaon Vs. M/sMitsubishi Electric Automotive India Pvt. Ltd., Manesar, Gurgaon’,decided on 16.05.2019.
Dismissed in the same terms.
Since the main case has been dismissed, the pending C.M.Application, if any, also stands dismissed.
(AJAY TEWARITJUDGE
July 11, 2019pooja sharma-l
(HARNARESH SINGH GILL)JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned
Whether Reportable |
Yes/NoYes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.