In D.k. Enterprises v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Central Circle-15, Mumbai, the High Court (2005) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 1119 OF 2005.ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 145 OF 2002WITHCHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 1121 OF 2005.IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 144 OF 2002
D.K. Enterprises
vs.The Deputy Commissioner ofIncome-tax, Central Circle-15,Mumbai.
Shri J.O. Mistry i/b K. Kaushik for the appellant.
Shri P. Danial with G. Hariharan for the respondent.
... Appellant.
... Respondent
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 29th August 2005.
P.C. :----
. Both the Chamber Summonses are allowed for the
reasons stated in the affidavit.
(J.P. DEVADHAR,J.)
(V.C. DAGA,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue