Case Law › High Court › Dq?Ttitled As.aryan Goyal v. Assistant C...

Dq?Ttitled As.aryan Goyal v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax,Central Circle 1, Chandigarh And Others

High Court 10 Feb 2022 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · phhc

Parties

Date of order

10 Feb 2022

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Dq?Ttitled As.aryan Goyal v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax,Central Circle 1, Chandigarh And Others, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Issue: For details, see judgment of even date passed inCWP No.22812 of DQ?Ttitled as.Aryan Goyal Versus Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,Central Circle 1, Chandigarh and others (AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASTH)JUDGE February 10[%&], 2022 Puneet (SANDEEP MOUDGIL)JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:YesWhether Reporta...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH 2216/4(PROCEEDINGS THROUGH V.C.) Civil Writ Petition No.24095 of 2021 (O&M)Date of Decision: February 10[th], 2022 Payal Goyal Versus. — Petitioner Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 1, Chandigarhand others ...Respondents CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICK AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASTHHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEBEEP MOUDGI Present:Mr. Deepak Chopra, Mr. Deepak Aggarwal andMs. Pratishtha Singh, Advocatesfor the petitioner(s). Mr. Tejender K. Joshi, Advocatefor the respondents, AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH, J. For details, see judgment of even date passed inCWP No.22812 of DQ?Ttitled as.Aryan Goyal Versus Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,Central Circle 1, Chandigarh and others (AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASTH)JUDGE February 10[%&], 2022 Puneet (SANDEEP MOUDGIL)JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:YesWhether Reportable:No.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.