Dr. Arvind Balkrishna Goregaonkar v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)And Ors
High Court
15 Jan 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Dr. Arvind Balkrishna Goregaonkar v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)And Ors
Date of order
15 Jan 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Dr. Arvind Balkrishna Goregaonkar v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)And Ors, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Decision: 3.Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
Pradnya Bhogale
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONWRIT PETITION NO. 3220 OF 2019
Dr. Arvind Balkrishna Goregaonkar
..Petitioner
vs.
The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)and Ors.
..Respondents
…........
Mr. Viral Shukla a/w Ms. Priti Shukla, Mr. Darshan Ashar andMs. Mansi Thakkar I/b. M/s. Shukla and Associates for Petitioner.
…........
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR &
M.S.KARNIK, JJ.
DATE : 15 JANUARY 2020
P.C.:-
On 3 December 2019, the following order waspassed :-
“Ms. Thakkar, learned Counsel appearing for thePetitioner seeks an adjournment. At her request thePetition is being adjourned to 8 January 2020.
2.However, we may point out that this Petition isfiled challenging an order date 3 January 2018 passedby the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (the Tribunal)under Section 254(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961(the Act). The remedy of the Petitioner, if aggrievedby the order dated 3 January 2018 passed by theTribunal, would be by way of an Appeal as providedunder Section 260A of the Act.
3. On the aforesaid being pointed out to thelearned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner, shementions that she would examine the same and makeher submissions on the next date.
4.In the above view, we adjourn the Petition to 15January 2020.”
2.The learned counsel for the Petitioner accepts theposition that the Appeal will have to be filed.
3.Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn.
4.Liberty to file an Appeal.
(M.S.KARNIK, J.)
(NITIN JAMDAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.