Dr Dilip Raj v. State Of Rajasthan
High Court
23 Nov 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Dr Dilip Raj v. State Of Rajasthan
Date of order
23 Nov 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Dr Dilip Raj v. State Of Rajasthan, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Decision: The writ petition is disposed of accordingly.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8964/2022
Dr Dilip Raj S/o Shri P.c. Hadia, Aged About 54 Years, R/o L-28,Income Tax Colony, Durgapura, Tonk Road, Jaipur (Rajasthan)
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary,Medical Education Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur.Medical Education Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. Deputy Secretary, Medical Education DepartmentRajasthan, Jaipur.Rajasthan, Jaipur.
3. Principal And Controller, S.m.s. Medical College, Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Indresh Sharma For Respondent(s):
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYALOrder
23/11/2022
Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw thiswrit petition as he has instructions to file a representation forredressal of his grievance(s) in the light of the judgment of thisCourt dated 20.09.2017 passed in SB Civil Writ PetitionNo.15172/2015: State of Rajasthan & Ors. versus ChetnaMeena.
The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. However, if anysuch representation is filed by the petitioner, it is expected fromthe respondents to decide the same expeditiously in accordancewith law.
(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J
Manish/77
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.