Case LawHigh Court › Dr. H.s. Bawa Through L.rs v. The Commis...

Dr. H.s. Bawa Through L.rs v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax & Another

High Court 01 Apr 2010 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Dr. H.s. Bawa Through L.rs v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax & Another
Date of order
01 Apr 2010
Assessment year(s)
1980-81
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Dr. H.s. Bawa Through L.rs v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax & Another, the High Court (2010) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: Whether reporters of local newspapers may beallowed to see the judgment?2.

Decision: Accordingly, this petition is allowed and Notice dated29.3.1989, Annexure P-6 is quashed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH. C.W.P. No.7093 of 1990Date of decision: 1.4.2010 Dr. H.S. Bawa through L.Rs. Vs. The Commissioner of Income Tax & another. -----Petitioner. -----Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOELHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH 1. Whether reporters of local newspapers may beallowed to see the judgment?2. To be referred to reporters or not?3.Whether the judgment should be reported in theDigest? Present:-Mr. Ravish Sood, Advocatefor the petitioner.for the petitioner. Mr. Vivek Sethi, Advocatefor respondents. --- ORDER: 1. This petition seeks quashing of notice dated29.3.1989, Annexure P-6, under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, “the Act”) for reopening the assessment forthe assessment year 1980-81. 2. Main contention raised in the petition is that re-assessment proceedings could be initiated only within four yearsfrom the end of the relevant assessment year as laid down under Section 149(1) (b) of the Act while in the present case theimpugned notice is for beyond the said period. 3. Learned counsel for the revenue is unable to disputethe factual and legal submission put forward on behalf of thepetitioner. 4. Accordingly, this petition is allowed and Notice dated29.3.1989, Annexure P-6 is quashed. (ADARSH KUMAR GOEL) JUDGE April 01, 2010ashwani ( ALOK SINGH ) JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan