Dr. Madhusudan v. Gosavi
High Court
08 Aug 2005 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newas
Parties
Dr. Madhusudan v. Gosavi
Date of order
08 Aug 2005
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Dr. Madhusudan v. Gosavi, the High Court (2005) decided the matter.
Decision: The Writ Petition stands disposed of in above terms.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
: 1 :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION 1994 WRIT PETITION NO.2738 OF
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
1994 WRIT PETITION NO.2738 OF
Dr. Madhusudan V. Gosavi ...Petitioner.
V/s.
Income Tax Officer, Ward
1(2), Nashik and Others ...Respondents.
Mr.Atul Jasani with Mr.Pramod Vaidya for the
Petitioner.
Dr.P.Daniel for the Respondent.
CORAM: S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
J.H.BHATIA, JJ. DATE : 8th August, 2005.
J.H.BHATIA, JJ.
DATE : 8th August, 2005.
P.C.:
P.C.:
1. Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner
and the learned counsel for the Respondents.
2. The learned counsel for the Petitioner states
that within a period of 4 weeks, the Petitioner will
submit their objections with regard to the proposed
re-opening of the assessment under section 148 of the
Income Tax Act.
3. Dr.Daniel for the Respondent states that if
such objections are filed within a period of 4 weeks,
the concerned officer will pass a reasoned order
within a period of 12 weeks thereafter.
: 2 :
4. The Writ Petition stands disposed of in above
terms.
5. Issue certified copy.
(S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(J.H.BHATIA, J.)
(J.H.BHATIA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue