Dr. Neela Gokhale, Jj.dated : 25[Th] January 2024 v. Assistant
High Court
25 Jan 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newas
Parties
Dr. Neela Gokhale, Jj.dated : 25[Th] January 2024 v. Assistant
Date of order
25 Jan 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Dr. Neela Gokhale, Jj.dated : 25[Th] January 2024 v. Assistant, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
Digitallysigned byMEERAMEERAMAHESHMAHESHJADHAVJADHAVDate:2024.01.2910:50:59+0530
1/3 902 to 907-wp-10888-22&ors.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYCIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.10888 OF 2022 (902)
Vinod Santoshkumar Dhankani
….Petitioner
V/s.
Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax
Circle-1 & Anr
....Respondents
-----
Mr. Shreyas Shrivastava for Petitioner.Mr. Ajeet Manwani a/w Ms Samiksha Kanani for Respondents-Revenue.
------
WITHORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (L) NO.26693 OF 2022 (903)
Satish Chunilal Mehta
….Petitioner
V/s.Income Tax Officer, Ward 34(3)(2) & Ors
....Respondents
WITHWRIT PETITION NO.848 OF 2023 (904)
Amit Kapadia
….Petitioner
V/s.Asst. Commissioner of Income TaxCircle- 22(1) & Anr
....Respondents
WITHWRIT PETITION NO. 1811 OF 2023 (905)
Sanjaykumar Ratansingh Rathore
….Petitioner
V/s.Income Tax Officer, Ward 32(1)(1) & Ors....Respondents
WITHWRIT PETITION (L) NO.2758 OF 2023 (906)
Cadell Weaving Mill Co. Pvt Ltd.
….Petitioner
V/s.
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 4(1)(1) & Ors.
....Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION (L) NO.10606 OF 2023 (907)
Veda Vijay Raheja….Petitioner
V/s.Assistant Commissioner of Income TaxCircle 32(1) & Ors....Respondents
----
Mr. Gunjan Kakkad & Mr. Anuj Kishnadwala i/b Mint and Confreres withMr. Advait Dalvi i/b Ms Niyati Mankad Hakani for Petitioners-Assessees inrespective matters.
Mr. Akhileshwar Sharma with Ms Sakshi Kapadia i/b Ms Sushma Nagaraj,Mr. Vaibhav Date i/b Ms Swapna Gokhale and Mr. Subir Kumar withMs. Sruti Kalyanikar for Respondents-Revenue in respective matters.
----
CORAM : K. R. SHRIRAM &
Dr. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ.DATED : 25[th] JANUARY 2024
P.C. :
1Counsel for petitioners state that all these petitions will becovered by the judgment of New India Assurance Co. Ltd. V/s Assistant
Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 3(2)(1), Mumbai & Ors.[1]. Counsel for
respondents agree.
2Therefore, impugned orders passed under Section 148 (A)d of
the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) and the notices issued under Section148 of the Act in the respective petitions are hereby quashed and set aside.
3Petitions disposed.
1. 2024 SCC OnLine Bom 146
4Consequential notices or orders, if any, also stand quashed and
set aside.
5All other rights and contentions which have been raised in the
petitions are also kept open.
(Dr. NEELA GOKHALE, J.)
(K. R. SHRIRAM, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.