Dr. Rabindra Kumar Singh v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Patna[Central
High Court
21 Jan 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Dr. Rabindra Kumar Singh v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Patna[Central
Date of order
21 Jan 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Dr. Rabindra Kumar Singh v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Patna[Central, the High Court (2016) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNAMiscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1984 of 2015
In
MA 693 of 2010
======================================================
Dr. Rabindra Kumar Singh S/o Late Ram Charitra Prasad Singh, resident of E- 57, Ashok Vihar P.O. Hinoo, P.S.- Angora, District- Ranchi
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
Commissioner of Income Tax, Patna[central]
.... .... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dr. Miss R. Usha
For the Respondent/s : Mr. Archana Sinha @ Archana Shahi
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH
ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA)
2 21-01-2016
Upon hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, none appearing for the respondent and on consideration of the ground mentioned in the application M.A.No.693 of 2010 is directed to be restored to its original file.
The restoration application is, accordingly, allowed.
(Ramesh Kumar Datta, J)
B.Kr./-Sudip
(Sudhir Singh, J)
U
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue