Case LawHigh Court › Dr. Rajeshwar Prasad Singh v. Commission...

Dr. Rajeshwar Prasad Singh v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Patna

High Court 25 Apr 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Dr. Rajeshwar Prasad Singh v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Patna
Date of order
25 Apr 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Dr. Rajeshwar Prasad Singh v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Patna, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.

Decision: In the above circumstances, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.8661 of 2010 ====================================================== DR. RAJESHWAR PRASAD SINGH, S/O LATE RAM GULELA SINGH, AGED ABOUT 76 YRS., RESIDING AT H-21, DOCTOR'S COLONY, KANKERBAGH, P.O. HANUMAN NAGAR, P.S. KANKERBAGH IN THE TOWN AND DISTRICT OF PATNA .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), PATNA 2. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 1, PATNA 3. UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, GOVT. OF INDIA, CENTRAL SECRETARIAT, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110 001 4. THE SECRETARY, BUDHA INSTITUTE OF DENTAL & HOSPITAL, KANKERBAGH (NEAR T.V.TOWER), PATNA .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Singh and Mr. Pankaj, Advocates. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Raghib Ahsan(Asst.SG) Mr. Rishi Raj Sinha Mr. Harshwardhan Prasad and Mr. Gopesh Kumar (CGC) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEand HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 7 25-04-2011 Learned Advocate Mr. Pankaj has appeared for the writ petitioner. He has submitted that for a long time he has no contact with the writ petitioner and that the writ petitioner has not given further instruction. He is, therefore, unable to proceed further in the matter. In the above circumstances, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. ( R.M. Doshit, CJ ) ( Jyoti Saran, J ) Dilip.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan