Dr. Rajeshwar Prasad Singh v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Patna
High Court
25 Apr 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Dr. Rajeshwar Prasad Singh v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Patna
Date of order
25 Apr 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Dr. Rajeshwar Prasad Singh v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central), Patna, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Decision: In the above circumstances, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE No.8661 of 2010
======================================================
DR. RAJESHWAR PRASAD SINGH, S/O LATE RAM GULELA SINGH, AGED ABOUT 76 YRS., RESIDING AT H-21, DOCTOR'S COLONY, KANKERBAGH, P.O. HANUMAN NAGAR, P.S. KANKERBAGH IN THE TOWN AND DISTRICT OF PATNA
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL), PATNA
2. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 1, PATNA
3. UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, GOVT. OF INDIA, CENTRAL SECRETARIAT, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110 001 4. THE SECRETARY, BUDHA INSTITUTE OF DENTAL & HOSPITAL, KANKERBAGH (NEAR T.V.TOWER), PATNA
.... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Singh and Mr. Pankaj, Advocates.
For the Respondent/s : Mr. Raghib Ahsan(Asst.SG) Mr. Rishi Raj Sinha Mr. Harshwardhan Prasad and Mr. Gopesh Kumar (CGC)
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEand
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN
ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
7
25-04-2011
Learned Advocate Mr. Pankaj has appeared for the writ petitioner. He has submitted that for a long time he has no contact with the writ petitioner and that the writ petitioner has not given further instruction. He is, therefore, unable to proceed
further in the matter.
In the above circumstances, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
( R.M. Doshit, CJ )
( Jyoti Saran, J )
Dilip.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.