Dr. Sohanlal R. Gupta v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax &Ors
High Court
18 Sep 2012 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Dr. Sohanlal R. Gupta v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax &Ors
Date of order
18 Sep 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Dr. Sohanlal R. Gupta v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax &Ors, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 86 OF 1999
Dr. Sohanlal R. Gupta
..Appellant
versus
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax &Ors...Respondents
--------
Mr. B.V.Jhaveri alongwith Ms. Manju Sisodia for the Appellants.
Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Respondents.
.............
CORAM : S.J.VAZIFDAR &
M.S.SANKLECHA, JJ.
DATE
: 18[th] September, 2012
P.C. :
1This appeal by the appellant under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 from an order dated 14.06.1999 of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was heard alongwith Income Tax Appeal No.36 of 1999.
2Counsel for the appellant and Counsel for the respondent did not advance any separate submission in respect of this appeal. This was for
the reason that according to them, all questions raised at (i) to (vi) in this appeal would stand covered by the order in ITXA No. 36 of 1999 in respect of question nos. (i) to (vi) therein. The appellant herein is a part of the group/family of the appellant in ITXA No.36 of 1999.
3In view of the order passed in ITXA No. 36 of 1999, the question raised at (i) to (vi) in the present appeal are answered in the affirmative and in favour of the revenue-respondent.
4The appeal is dismissed. No order as to
cost.
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
(S.J.VAZIFDAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.