Dr.anant Raghunath Nagvekar v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax I, Kolhapur & Another
High Court
20 Jul 2011 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Dr.anant Raghunath Nagvekar v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax I, Kolhapur & Another
Date of order
20 Jul 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Dr.anant Raghunath Nagvekar v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax I, Kolhapur & Another, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 2.Both the appeals are, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1336 OF 2011
Dr.Anant Raghunath NagvekarVersusCommissioner of Income-tax I, Kolhapur & Another
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1337 OF 2011
Dr.Smt.Kirti Anant Nagvekar
VersusCommissioner of Income-tax I, Kolhapur & Another
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
None for the appellants.Mr.Vimal Gupta for the respondent.
CORAM : J.P. Devadhar &
A.A. Sayed, JJ.
P.C. :
DATE : 20[th] July, 2011.
1.None for the appellant in both the appeals. Even on the last occasion, none appeared on behalf of the appellants in both the appeals.
2.Both the appeals are, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution with no order as to costs.
(A.A. Sayed, J.)
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue