D.r.b. Associates Kasturba Road, Chandrapur v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv, Nagpur
High Court
21 Oct 2010 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
D.r.b. Associates Kasturba Road, Chandrapur v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv, Nagpur
Date of order
21 Oct 2010
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In D.r.b. Associates Kasturba Road, Chandrapur v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv, Nagpur, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.
Decision: Both the appeals are disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 97 OF 2004
(The Commissioner of Income Tax-IV, Nagpur .vs. M/s. D.R.B. Associates, Chandrapur)WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 157 OF 2007
(D.R.B. Associates Kasturba Road, Chandrapur ..vs.. The Commissioner of Income Tax-IV, Nagpur)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Office Notes, Office Memoranda ofCoram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shri Anand Parchure, Advocate for the Revenue.Shri N.S. Bhattad, Advocate for the assessee.
CORAM:- J.P. DEVADHAR AND A.B. CHAUDHARI, JJ.DATED :- 21st OCTOBER, 2010
1.This appeal is taken up by consent along with Income Tax Appeal No.157 of 2007. In the light of the proviso added to Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 by the Finance Act, 2006 w.e.f. 1-10-1991 validating the notices issued under Section 143(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, Learned Counsel on both sides agree that the impugned order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Nagpur dated 30[th] April, 2004 be quashed and set aside and the matter be remanded back to the Tribunal for deciding the appeal on merit afresh. Accordingly, the impugned order dated 30[th] April, 2004 is quashed and set aside and the matter is remanded back to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Nagpur for deciding the appeals on
merit. All the contention are kept open. Both the appeals are
disposed of accordingly with no order as to costs.
JUDGE
JUDGE
pma
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.