Dr.dinesh Jain v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax 11
High Court
06 Sep 2013 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Dr.dinesh Jain v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax 11
Date of order
06 Sep 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Dr.dinesh Jain v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax 11, the High Court (2013) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
gopi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.825 OF 2012
Dr.Dinesh Jain..AppellantVs.Commissioner of Income-tax 11....Respondents
Mr.Firoze B. Andhyarujina, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Advait Sethna i/b. S.D. Bhosale for Appellant.Mr. P.C. Chhotary for respondents.
CORAM : MOHIT S. SHAH, C.J. & M.S. SANKLECHA, J.DATE : 06 September 2013
P.C.:
Since the appeal is directed against the judgment of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for 4 assessment years i.e. 2004-05 to 2007-08, we permit the appellant to withdraw this appeal with a view to filing 4 separate appeals for the respective assessment years. It is, however, clarified that the office shall permit the appellant to place all the Exhibits filed in this appeal as Exhibits in the first of the 4 appeals to be filed as aforesaid. Filing Exhibits in the other 3 appeals is dispensed with.
2.The learned counsel for the appellants states that the 4 appeals as aforesaid will be filed within 3 weeks from today, but in the meantime the respondents may not be allowed to take any coercive action. It is stated that as against a tax demand of Rs.72 lakhs approximately, the appellant has already paid about Rs.67 lakhs.
itxa-825-12.sxw
3.In view of the above, the respondents shall not take any coercive steps for the recovery of the balance tax amount and the interest for a period of 4 weeks from today. However, the appellant shall continue to pay the monthly installments as the appellant has been paying so far.
CHIEF JUSTICE
M.S. SANKLECHA, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.