Case LawHigh Court › Dr.geeta Sagar v. The Commissioner Of In...

Dr.geeta Sagar v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 30 Apr 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Dr.geeta Sagar v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
30 Apr 2021
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Dr.geeta Sagar v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 30.04.2021 CORAM THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH W.P.NO.10644 OF 2021 Dr.Geeta Sagar ...Petitioner ..Vs..1. The Commissioner of Income Tax 121, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 034 2. The Income Tax Officer Non-Corporate ward 3(1), Office of the Commissioner of Income Tax 121, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai-600034 ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia praying to issue Writ of mandamus directing theRespondents to sanction refund of Rs.7,16,750/- together withinterest within a time frame fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.J.V.Niranjan For Respondents : Mr.Prabu Mukund Arun Kumar Junior Standing CounselO R D E R The petitioner has prayed for a mandamus directing therespondents to sanction refund of an amount of Rs.7,16,750/-along with interest within a stipulated time frame. 2. On 28.04.2021, Mr.Prabu Mukund Arun Kumar, learnedJunior Standing Counsel, who has accepted notice for therespondent, was directed to obtain instructions on the pendencyof the request for the refund as well as quantification of theamount payable and status of refund. Today he states that therefund sought for, a sum of Rs.7,16,750/- will be issued to thepetitioner within four weeks from today. This is recorded. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3. Mr.J.V.Niranjan, learned counsel for the petitioner, oninstructions, would submit that he does not pursue the claim forinterest. This is also recorded. 4. In the light of the aforesaid, this writ petition isclosed. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CCC) //True Copy// Sub Assistant RegistrarskaTo 1.The Commissioner of Income Tax 121, Mahatma Gandhi Road,Nungambakkam, Chennai-600 0342.The Income Tax OfficerNon-Corporate ward 3(1),Office of the Commissioner of Income Tax 121, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai-600034.+1cc to M/s.Hema Muralikrishnan, Advocate, S.R.No.26696W.P.No.10644 of 2021SR-II(CO)CS/02/07/2021
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan