In Dtc Employees Provident Fund Trust v. Versus, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Decision: Recording the said statement, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~11
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(C) 4644/2017
DTC EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND TRUST ..... Petitioner
Through Mr. Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate. versus versus
THE COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS) ..... Respondent Through Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Sr. Standing Counsel for Revenue.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR
O R D E R% 12.02.2018
Counsel for the parties state that refunds have been processed and interest has also been paid till the date of processing of refunds.
In view of the aforesaid position, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the writ petition is rendered infructuous.
Recording the said statement, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous.
SANJIV KHANNA, J.
FEBRUARY 12, 2018 MR/NA
CHANDER SHEKHAR, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.