Case Law › High Court › Durg, Chhattisgarh v. Inder

Durg, Chhattisgarh v. Inder

High Court 10 Nov 2022 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · cghccisdb

Parties

Date of order

10 Nov 2022

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Durg, Chhattisgarh v. Inder, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal.

Decision: The writ petition accordingly stands dismissed as withdrawn withthe aforesaid liberty.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Order Sheet WPT No. 229 of 2022 1. Smt. Leela Choudhary Legal Heir Of Late Sunderlal Choudhary Milan Chowk,Near Atta Chakki, Old Fish Market Camp, Bhilai, P.S. Chavni, Bhilai, District :Near Atta Chakki, Old Fish Market Camp, Bhilai, P.S. Chavni, Bhilai, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner Versus 1. The Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal Raipur Bench, 5th Floor, B And C Wing,Central Secretariat Bhawan, Sector 24, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District :Raipur, Chhattisgarh Central Secretariat Bhawan, Sector 24, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District :Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. Income-Tax Officer-1 Aaykar Bhawan, New Civic Centre, Bhilai, District : Durg,Chhattisgarh Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents 10.11.2022Shri S. Rajeshwara Rao and Shri Manoj Kumar Sinha, Advocatesfor the petitioner. Shri Amit Choudhary and Smt. Naushina Ali, Advocates forrespondents. After arguing for sometime learned counsel for the petitioner praysfor withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to prefer an appeal underSection 260A of the Income Tax Act. The writ petition accordingly stands dismissed as withdrawn withthe aforesaid liberty. Sd/-(P. Sam Koshy)Judge Inder

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.