Dwarkadhis Projects (P) Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv
High Court
05 Feb 2015 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Dwarkadhis Projects (P) Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv
Date of order
05 Feb 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Dwarkadhis Projects (P) Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iv, the High Court (2015) decided the matter.
Decision: In these circumstances, we set aside the common order dated 09.07.2014 passed under Section 127 of the said Act.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
•
j.
to 6
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
W.P.(C) 487/2015 and CM No. 824/2015
+
..... Petitioner
DWARKADHIS PROJECTS (P) LTD.
versus
..... Respondent
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV
W.P.(C) 488/2015 and CM No. 828/2015
+
SULEKH CHAND JAINSIO SHRI GOPI RAM JAIN versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV
..... Petitioner
..... Respondent
+
W.P.(C) 489/2015 and CM No. 830/2015
..... Petitioner
EXOTIC BUILDCON PVT. LTD.
versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV
..... Respondent
+
W.P.(C) 490/2015 and CM No. 832/2015
VIKAS JAIN
..... Petitioner ..... Respondent
versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV
+
W.P.(C) 745/2015 and CM No. 132412015
FNS INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD.
. .... Petitioner
versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV
..... Respondent
Through:
Mr Salil Kapoor, Mr Vikas Jain and Mr Sanat Kapoor for petitioners Mr Rohit Madan for revenue
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
ORDER 05.02.2015
%
These writ petitions pertain to the proceedings under Section 127 of the
Income-tax Act, 1961, whereby the Commissioner of Income Tax (Delhi-IV) has directed that the assessments of the petitioners be transferred to DCIT, Central Circle,
Kamal, Haryana.
We have heard the learned counsel for the parties. We are of the view that the petitioners were initially not given the reasons as to why their assessments are being transferred from Delhi to Kamal. As a result, the petitioners have a legitimate grievance that they could not file detailed objections in respect of the reasons which are now discernable in the order and in the other documents which have been subsequently filed in the present writ petitions by the respondent.
In these circumstances, we set aside the common order dated 09.07.2014 passed under Section 127 of the said Act. It will be open to the respondent to issue fresh notices, if they so desire, under Section 127 for transfer of the cases to Kamal. The reasons for seeking the said transfer should be indicated in the notice so that the petitioners could give meaningful replies to the same. After the objections of the petitioners are considered, the concerned authority may pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.
With these directions, these writ petitions stand disposed of.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.