Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-4, Patna v. M/S Takshila Education Society Branch Officer, Kashi Place, Patna, B
High Court
01 Sep 2017 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-4, Patna v. M/S Takshila Education Society Branch Officer, Kashi Place, Patna, B
Date of order
01 Sep 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-4, Patna v. M/S Takshila Education Society Branch Officer, Kashi Place, Patna, B, the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNAMiscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.295 of 2014
In MA 532 of 2008
======================================================
1. The Commissioner of Income Tax Central, Patna.
2. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-4, Patna.
.... .... Petitioner/s Versus
M/S Takshila Education Society Branch Officer, Kashi Place, Patna, B-549, New Friends Colony, New Delhi.
.... .... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mrs. Archana Sinha @ Archana Shahi For the Respondent/s : Mr.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD
ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI)
4 01-09-2017 M.A. No.532 of 2008 is restored for the reasons
indicated in paragraph 4 of the restoration application with a condition that the defects, whose non-removal led to dismissal of the appeal, if not already removed, must be removed within two weeks, failing which this application shall stand dismissed without further reference to a Bench.
Arvind/-
(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)
(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)
U
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue