Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle – 1, Kota v. Shri Bharat Kothari, 30-31, Kothari Bhawan, New Grain Mandi,Kota
High Court
07 Feb 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle – 1, Kota v. Shri Bharat Kothari, 30-31, Kothari Bhawan, New Grain Mandi,Kota
Date of order
07 Feb 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle – 1, Kota v. Shri Bharat Kothari, 30-31, Kothari Bhawan, New Grain Mandi,Kota, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: These appeals are, accordingly, dismissed as notmaintainable.” 2.This appeal is dismissed in the same terms.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 47/2021
Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle – 1, Kota
----Appellant
Versus
Shri Bharat Kothari, 30-31, Kothari Bhawan, New Grain Mandi,Kota.
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr.Shantanu Sharma with Ms.BhawnaLaddha For Respondent(s):
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA
Order
07/02/2024
1.Learned counsel for the appellant fairly submits that theissue involved in the present case is squarely covered by thedecision of this Court in DB Income Tax Appeal No.20/2019[Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax, Alwar Vs. Kapil Mittal,Kothi, Near Old Bus Stand, Dholpur (Raj.)] and connectedmatter decided on 22[nd] November, 2023. Following order waspassed:
“Heard.
Today when these appeals come up for hearing,learned counsel for the appellants is unable to satisfythe Court with regard to the change in the legalposition as stated in the decision of the Bombay HighCourt and Gujarat High Court in the matter ofapplication of circular dated 06.09.2019.
In view of the above and taking into considerationthat circular dated 06.09.2019 would not operateretrospectively, these appeals involving the tax effectsof less than One Crore are liable to be dismissed asnot maintainable.
These appeals are, accordingly, dismissed as notmaintainable.”
2.This appeal is dismissed in the same terms.
(SHUBHA MEHTA),J
(AVNEESH JHINGAN),J
Preeti Asopa / 44
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.