Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 13(1 v. Jvg Steels India Ltd Through Official Liquidatior
High Court
23 Dec 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 13(1 v. Jvg Steels India Ltd Through Official Liquidatior
Date of order
23 Dec 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 13(1 v. Jvg Steels India Ltd Through Official Liquidatior, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.
Decision: With the above directions, the appeal is disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~21
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+CO.A(SB) 35/2016
DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 13(1)
..... Appellant
Through:Ms. Lakshmi Gurung, Advocate.
versus
JVG STEELS INDIA LTD THROUGH OFFICIAL LIQUIDATIOR
..... Respondent
Through:Mr. Rajiv Bahl, Advocate for OL.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDULO R D E R%23.12.2016
CO.APPL.5143/2016 (Exemption)
Exemption granted subject to all just exceptions.
The applications are disposed of accordingly.
-CO.APPL.5142/2016 (Delay in refiling)
For the reasons stated in the application the delay of 19 days in re-filingthe appeal is condoned.
The application is disposed of accordingly.
CO.A.(SB) 35/2016
The present appeal assails the order dated 08.09.2016, passed by theOfficial Liquidator, rejecting the claim of the Income Tax Department.
Notice.
Mr. Rajiv Bahl, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the OfficialLiquidator.
Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant as well as counsel appearing
on behalf of the Official Liquidator, in unison, state that the order assailed in thepresent appeal would require re-consideration and in this regard, it would beappropriate to remit the matter back to the Official Liquidator for de novoconsideration of the claim instituted on behalf of the Income Tax Department.
Having heard counsel appearing on behalf of the parties, I am of the viewthat in the present appeal, it would be just, necessary and appropriate to setaside the impugned order dated 08.09.2016 and remit the matter back to theOfficial Liquidator for fresh consideration of the claim on behalf of theappellant, in accordance with law.
Directed accordingly.
With the above directions, the appeal is disposed of.
In the first instance, list the claim filed on behalf of the Income TaxDepartment before the Official Liquidator for de novo consideration on13.01.2017.
DECEMBER 23, 2016mk
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.