Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-2, Ajmer v. Jai Narayan Agarwal, Near Agarsen Bhawan Street, Madanganj,Kishangarh
High Court
23 Sep 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-2, Ajmer v. Jai Narayan Agarwal, Near Agarsen Bhawan Street, Madanganj,Kishangarh
Date of order
23 Sep 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-2, Ajmer v. Jai Narayan Agarwal, Near Agarsen Bhawan Street, Madanganj,Kishangarh, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 2.The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 31/2023
Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-2, Ajmer.
----Appellant
Versus
Jai Narayan Agarwal, Near Agarsen Bhawan Street, Madanganj,Kishangarh.
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Anurag Mathur, Adv. for
Mr. Shantanu Sharma, Adv.
For Respondent(s): Mr. Siddharth Ranka, Adv. with Ms. Satwika Jha, Adv. &Ms. Satwika Jha, Adv. &
Mr. Rohan Chatter, Adv.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR
Order
23/09/2024
1.The tax effect in appeal is below Rupees Two Crores, in viewof the circular of Central Board of Direct Taxes dated 17.09.2024,learned counsel for appellant seeks permission to withdraw the
appeal.
2.The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
3.The formulated substantial question of law is kept open.
(ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J
(AVNEESH JHINGAN),J
Mohita/Riya/10
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.