Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-5, Patna v. Nawal Kishore Singh, Saguna More, Danapur, Patna
High Court
22 Aug 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-5, Patna v. Nawal Kishore Singh, Saguna More, Danapur, Patna
Date of order
22 Aug 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-5, Patna v. Nawal Kishore Singh, Saguna More, Danapur, Patna, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
6
22-08-2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNAMiscellaneous Appeal No.625 of 2016
======================================================
1. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax Ii, Patna
2. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-5, Patna.
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
Nawal Kishore Singh, Saguna More, Danapur, Patna
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMAORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
This appeal is directed against the order dated15.01.2016, passed by the Ld. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,Patna Bench, Patna in ITA (SS) No. 02/Pat/2013.
In view of Circular No. 3 of 2018 dated 11.07.2018and Circular No.17 of 2019 dated 8[th] of August, 2019 issued bythe Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department ofRevenue Central Board Direct Taxes Judicial Section, thepresent appeal, on account of the cumulative monetary valuebeing less than one crore, is permitted to be withdrawn.
Ordered accordingly.
K.C.Jha/-DKS
U
Interlocutory Application(s), if any, shall standdisposed of.
(Sanjay Karol, CJ)
( Satyavrat Verma, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue