Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax-I (1) Bhopal v. M/S C.i. Builders Pvt. Ltd
High Court
29 Oct 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · mphc_db_jbp
Parties
Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax-I (1) Bhopal v. M/S C.i. Builders Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
29 Oct 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax-I (1) Bhopal v. M/S C.i. Builders Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2021) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
S/
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR MADHYA PRADESH, AT JABALPUR
(DIVISION BENCH)
MCC No. 597 of 2021
Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax-I (1) Bhopal
…...... Applicant
Versus
M/s C.I. Builders Pvt. Ltd.
....... Respondent
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ravi Malimath, Chief JusticeHon’ble Mr. Justice Vijay Kumar Shukla, Judge
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Presence:
Shri Kunal Dubey, Advocate for the applicant.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ORDER (Oral)(29.10.2021)
Per: Ravi Malimath, Chief Justice
This application has been filed seeking restoration of Review PetitionNo.656 of 2020, which was dismissed for non-compliance of commonconditional order dated 07.01.2021, whereby time was granted to cure theoffice objections.
Since the review petition was dismissed even before issuance of notice,therefore, we do not find it necessary to issue notice of this application to therespondent.
Considering the reasons assigned in the application, the same constitutesufficient cause, hence, the order dated 07.01.2021 is recalled.
R.P. No.656 of 2020 is restored to its file.
The applicant shall comply with the office objections within a period offour weeks from today.
Accordingly, the restoration application is allowed and disposed off.
In view of the above, pending interlocutory applications are alsodisposed off.
(RAVI MALIMATH)
(VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA) JUDGE
CHIEF JUSTICE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.