Case Law › High Court › Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax Iv Nagpur...

Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax Iv Nagpur v. M/S Gst Infrastructure Nagpur

High Court 11 Oct 2013 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · testcase

Parties

Date of order

11 Oct 2013

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax Iv Nagpur v. M/S Gst Infrastructure Nagpur, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 65 of 2013 decided on 11[th] October 2013, this appeal is also dismissed with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET No.IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 68 OF 2013 Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax IV Nagpur VERSUS M/s GST Infrastructure Nagpur - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's ordersappearances, Court's orders of directionsand Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri Anand Parchure counsel for the appellant.Shri L. S. Dewani counsel for the respondent. CORAM: SMT. VASANTI A. NAIKAND A. S. CHANDURKAR, JJ.OCTOBER 11, 2013. DATE: For the reasons recorded in Income Tax Appeal No. 65 of 2013 decided on 11[th] October 2013, this appeal is also dismissed with no order as to costs. JUDGE JUDGE svk

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.