Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Heard Counsel For The Parties
High Court
07 Jun 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Heard Counsel For The Parties
Date of order
07 Jun 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Heard Counsel For The Parties, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 956 OF 2011
ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 202 OF 2011
Mr. Vishal D. Shah
Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax
...AppellantVersus...
Respondent
Mr. Kunal Vajani with Mr. Ankit Virmarli, A.P.P. for State. Ms. Padma Divakar for Respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR ANDSMT.R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, JJ.DATE : 7TH JUNE, 2011.
P.C.
Heard counsel for the parties.
For the reasons mentioned in the Notice of Motion, the same is made absolute in
terms of prayer Clause (a).
( SMT.R.P, SONDURBALDOTA,, J. )
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue