Earning Exempt Income?” v. Reliance Utilities & Power Ltd.[1]And Cit Vs. Hdfc Bank Ltd.[2
High Court
22 Jan 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Earning Exempt Income?” v. Reliance Utilities & Power Ltd.[1]And Cit Vs. Hdfc Bank Ltd.[2
Date of order
22 Jan 2018
Assessment year(s)
2008-09
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Earning Exempt Income?” v. Reliance Utilities & Power Ltd.[1]And Cit Vs. Hdfc Bank Ltd.[2, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: 2.The Revenue urges the following question of law for our consideration: (a)“Whether on the facts and in the circumstance of the case and in law, the Tribunal is right in ignoring the method for computation of the disallowance as per provisions of Rule 8D u/s.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
jsn
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 678 OF 2015
The Commissioner of Income Tax - 4… AppellantVersusM/s. Edelweiss Securities Pvt. Ltd.…Respondent
Mr. Ashok Kotangale, i/b Padma Divakar, for the Appellant.Mr. Jitendra Jain, with Mr. Jas Sanghavi, i/b PDS Legal for the Respondent.
PC:-
CORAM:M.S.SANKLECHA &RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, JJ.DATED:22ND JANUARY 2018
1.This Appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act), challenges the order dated 13 August 2014 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (the Tribunal). The impugned order dated 13 August 2014 is in respect of Assessment Year 2008-09.
2.The Revenue urges the following question of law for our consideration:
(a)“Whether on the facts and in the circumstance of the case and in law, the Tribunal is right in ignoring the method for computation of the disallowance as per provisions of Rule 8D u/s. 14A of the IT Act, 1961 for
earning exempt income?”
2.The impugned order of the Tribunal allowed the Respondent – Assessee's Appeal that no disallowance under Section 14A of the Act read with Rule 8D of the Income Tax Rules is warranted. This in view of the finding fact that the Respondent – Assessee was in possession of sufficient funds to make the investments and borrowed funds have not been utilized to earn the exempt income. Hence no disallowance of interest is permissible under Section 14A of the Act. Mr. Kotangale, the learned counsel for the Revenue very fairly states that the issue raised herein stands concluded in favour of the Respondent and against the Appellant – Revenue in the case of CIT Vs. Reliance Utilities & Power Ltd.[1]and CIT Vs. HDFC Bank Ltd.[2]
3.In view of the above, the question as framed do not give rise to any substantial question of law. Thus not entertained.
4.Accordingly, Appeal dismissed. No order as to costs.
( RIYAZ I. CHAGLA J. )
(M.S.SANKLECHA,J.)
1313 ITR 340 (Bombay).
2366 ITR 505.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.