Eee Apppellant v. M/S. Punjab State Warehousing Corporationwee

a IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA|AT CHANDIGARH RA-CR-231-CI[-2016 in LITA-825-200Date of Decision : 7.2.2020 The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Chandigarh eee APpPellant Versus M/s. Punjab State Warehousing Corporationwee RESpondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JIUSTICE AJAY TEWAR*HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN::: Present :Mr. Yogesh Putney, Sr. Standing counsel with|Mr. Ajiteshwar Singh, Advocatefor the applicant-appellant. Mr. B.M.Monga, Advocate andMr. Rohit Kaura, Advocatefor the non-applicant-respondent. ::: AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral) 1]This is a review application under Order 47 Rule 1 againstthe order dated 6.5.2010 whereby the bunch of appeals were disposed ofby adopting the same course as was adopted by the Madras High Court inthe case ofCommissioner ofIncome Tax v. Nevveli Lignite Corporation [td., (2007) 293 ITR 362. ?DAgegrieved against the aforesaid order the Department fileSLP before the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court vide order dated4.7.2016 overruled the decision of this Court and permitted theDepartment to move an application before this Court for revival of theirappeals. 3By this present application, the applicant-department praysfor restoration of the case to the original number, 4Learned counsel for the non-applicant-respondent states thatthey have no objection if the present application is allowed and main caseis restored to its original number, 5In these circumstances, the restoration application is allowedand the main case is restored to its original number. Registry is directedto list this case as per roster after obtaining appropriate orders fromHon'ble the Chief Justice. onReview application stands disposed of, (AJAY TEWARIT) JUDGE 72.2020anuradha (JITENDRA CHAUHAN)JUDGE Whether speaking/reasonedYes/NoWhether reportableYes/No