Case LawHigh Court › Eee Apppellant v. Sh. Rohit Kumar

Eee Apppellant v. Sh. Rohit Kumar

High Court 20 Sep 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Eee Apppellant v. Sh. Rohit Kumar
Date of order
20 Sep 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Eee Apppellant v. Sh. Rohit Kumar, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA|AT CHANDIGARH 1909 ITA-51-2019 (O&M)Date of Decision : 20.9.2019 The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-3, Ludhiana eee APpPellant Versus Sh. Rohit Kumar ee RESpondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JIUSTICE AJAY TEWAR*HON'BLE MR. JUSTICK HARNARESH SINGH GILL888 Present:Mr. Rajesh Katoch, Sr. Standing counsel withMs. Pridhi Jaswinder Sandhu, Jr. Standing counselfor the appellant(s).Ms. Pridhi Jaswinder Sandhu, Jr. Standing counselfor the appellant(s). 888 AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral) 1]Learned counsel for the appellant-revenue states that sincethe tax effect involved is less than the monetary limit as prescribed inCircular No.3 of 2018 dated 11.07.2018 issued by the Central Board ofDirect Taxes, further amended vide Circular No.17 of 2019 datedO08 08.2019 read with Letter No.KF.No.279/Misc/M-93/2018-ITJ date20.08.2019, he has instructions to withdraw the present appeal. However,he prayed that liberty be granted to the appellant-revenue to file anapplication for revival of the appeal, in case something survives therein. 2 Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. ,'Since the main case has been dismissed as withdrawn, thepending C.M, if any also stands disposed of, (AJAY TEWARIT) JUDGE 20.9.2019 anuradha (HARNARESH SINGH GILL)JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned!Yes/NoWhether reportable!Yes/NoWhether reportable!Yes/No
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan