Case LawHigh Court › Electronics Enterprises v. Deputy Commis...

Electronics Enterprises v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Taxspecial Rg. 42, Mumbai

High Court 18 Sep 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Electronics Enterprises v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Taxspecial Rg. 42, Mumbai
Date of order
18 Sep 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Electronics Enterprises v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Taxspecial Rg. 42, Mumbai, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1115 OF 2000 Electronics Enterprises v/s Deputy Commissioner of Income TaxSpecial Rg. 42, Mumbai Mr. A.P. Sathe, Sr. Counsel a/w. Mr. MandarVaidya with Mr. Suvarna Shendkar for Appellant Mr. J.S. Saluja for respondentMr. A.R. Kumbhare 6(2)(3) present in court Coram : Dr. S. RadhakrishnanS.J. Kathawalla, JJ.Date : 18.9.2008 P.C. : Appellant : Respondent .Heard the learned counsel Mr. Sathe for theappellant and the learned counsel Mr. Saluja for therespondent. 1990-1991 the Respondent accepts the hybrid method ofthe accounting adopted by the assessee. for. 3.In view of the aforesaid statement the order of the Tribunal impugned in the above Appeal is setaside. 4.We are therefore not answering the questions raised in the above appeal. Appeal stands disposed ofaccordingly. 5.There would be no order as to costs. (S.J. Kathawalla,J.) (Dr. S.Radhakrishnan,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan