Elinjipra P.o., Thrissur, Pin v. Menonmeera V.menonr.sreejithk.krishna
High Court
20 Mar 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Elinjipra P.o., Thrissur, Pin v. Menonmeera V.menonr.sreejithk.krishna
Date of order
20 Mar 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Elinjipra P.o., Thrissur, Pin v. Menonmeera V.menonr.sreejithk.krishna, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.
Decision: 2.The petitioner has challenged Ext.P1 assessment order as confirmed by Ext.P5 appellate order.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAVI
MONDAY, THE 20 DAY OF MARCH 2023 / 29TH PHALGUNA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 9267 OF 2023
PETITIONER:
ELENJIKKAL DEVASSIKUTTY REJU
PROPRIETOR, M/S. ELENJIKKAL AGENCIES,
XVI/158A, CHOWKA ROAD,
ELINJIPRA P.O., THRISSUR, PIN - 680721BY ADVS.HARISANKAR V. MENONMEERA V.MENONR.SREEJITHK.KRISHNA
RESPONDENTS:
1THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCIRCLE 2 (1), RANGE 2, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, S.T. NAGAR, THRISSUR, PIN - 6800012NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTREDELHI, PIN - 110001 REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS).SRI. JOSE JOSEPH, SC.
CIRCLE 2 (1), RANGE 2,
AAYAKAR BHAVAN, S.T. NAGAR,
DELHI, PIN - 110001
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON20.03.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
T.R. RAVI, J.
--------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------
Dated this the 20[th] day of March, 2023
JUDGMENT
Admit. Standing Counsel takes notice for the respondents.
2.The petitioner has challenged Ext.P1 assessment order as
confirmed by Ext.P5 appellate order. The main ground of challenge isthat the assessment order was issued without hearing the petitioner andignoring the request for adjournment submitted by the CharteredAccountant. It would appear from the acknowledgments produced thatthe requests for adjournments were after the date fixed for response.
3.I do not think the question as to not affording an opportunityof hearing can hence be considered in this writ petition and the samewould have to be taken up before the statutory authority in appeal.
This writ petition is hence closed without prejudice to the right ofthe petitioner to prefer an appeal against Ext.P5 appellate order.
Sd/-
T.R. RAVI
JUDGE
Pn
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 9267/2023
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS
Exhibit P1
COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2015-16 DTD. 06-12-2017
Exhibit P2
COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORETHE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), THRISSUR DTD. 29-01-2018
Exhibit P3
COPY OF ADJOURNMENT REQUEST UPLOADED IN THE DEPARTMENT WEBSITE DTD. 06-01-2023
Exhibit P4COPY OF ADJOURNMENT REQUEST UPLOADED IN THE DEPARTMENT WEBSITE DTD. 25-01-2023
Exhibit P5COPYOF ORDER ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT DTD. 02-03-2023
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.