Case LawHigh Court › End Of Picture Text -----<Br> v. Acit_ 3...

End Of Picture Text -----<Br> v. Acit_ 376 Itr 87. The Itat Followed That Judgment

High Court 07 May 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
End Of Picture Text -----<Br> v. Acit_ 376 Itr 87. The Itat Followed That Judgment
Date of order
07 May 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In End Of Picture Text -----<Br> v. Acit_ 376 Itr 87. The Itat Followed That Judgment, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal.

Decision: The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

$~69 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 544/2018 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Puneet Rai with Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advs. versus CASIO INDIA COMPANY PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA O R D E R% 07.05.2018 The issue sought to be urged by the Revenue i.e. whether having regard to the language of Section 254 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereafter referred to as „the Act‟), the Tribunal (ITAT) could have extended the interim order beyond the prescribed period is now answered against the authorities in the judgment reported as Pepsi Foods Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT 376 ITR 87. The ITAT followed that judgment. No substantial question of law therefore arises. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J MAY 07, 2018 kks A. K. CHAWLA, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan