Case Law › High Court › End Of Picture Text -----<Br> v. Qualcom...

End Of Picture Text -----<Br> v. Qualcomm Technologies Inc

High Court 21 Mar 2025 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

21 Mar 2025

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In End Of Picture Text -----<Br> v. Qualcomm Technologies Inc, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.

Decision: 2.Accordingly, the present appeal is disposed of on account of low tax effect.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

$~40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 87/2024 and CM APPL. 6543/2024 & CM APPL. 6544/2024 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -3 .....Appellant Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, SSC & Mr. Anant Mann, JSC. versus QUALCOMM TECHNOLOGIES INC. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Nishant Thakkar, Ms. Jasmin Amalsadwala & Mr. Nikhil Ranjan, Advocates. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRUHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIA O R D E R21.03.2025 % 1.The tax involvement in the present appeal is below the threshold limit of ₹2,00,00,000/- as stipulated in the Circular dated 17.09.2024 and is not covered by any exceptions as set out in the circular. 2.Accordingly, the present appeal is disposed of on account of low tax effect. Pending applications are also disposed of. VIBHU BAKHRU, J MARCH 21, 2025 M TEJAS KARIA, J Click here to check corrigendum, if any

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.