Case LawHigh Court › End Of Picture Text -----<Br> v. The Bih...

End Of Picture Text -----<Br> v. The Bihar State Electricity Board, Patna

High Court 21 Jul 2010 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
End Of Picture Text -----<Br> v. The Bihar State Electricity Board, Patna
Date of order
21 Jul 2010
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In End Of Picture Text -----<Br> v. The Bihar State Electricity Board, Patna, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.8 of 2006 8. 21.7.2010 Munni Lal, son of late Ram Gahan Ram, resident of Village-Chhotka Katara, Police Station Mohania, District- Kaimur, at present Chhawani Muhalla, Ward No.4, Bhabua, Police Station-Bhabua, District- Kaimur --------- Petitioner. Versus 1. The Bihar State Electricity Board, Patna through its Chairman namely M.M. Singh Bidyut Bhawan, Income Tax Golamber, Bailey Road, Patna. 2. The General Manager-cum-Chief Engineer, Magadh Electric Supply Area, Gaya, namely, Dinesh Rai 3.The Electrical Superintendent Engineer, Namely, Shiv Shankar Choudhary, Sasaram, District-Rohtas. 4. The Electrical Executive Engineer, namely Rambhaju Rajbanshi, Electric Supply Division, Bhabua, District- Kaimur. 5. The Assistant Electrical Engineer, namely, Kaushal Kishore, Electric Supply Sub-Division, Bhagwanpur, District- Kaimur. 6. The Deputy Director of Accounts (Headquarters), Bihar State Electricity Board, Patna, namely, Pradeep Kumar 7. The Deputy Director of Accounts, Magadh Area Gaya, namely, B.K. Nirala. —8. The State of Bihar -----ContemnersOpposite Parties. -------------- None appears on behalf of the petitioner. Heard Mr. Vijay Kumar Verma for the opposite parties, and Mr. Mahesh Prasad for the State. This application under Article 215 of the Constitution of India, read with section 12 of the contempt of Court’s Act, has been filed for the alleged non-implementation of the order dated 19.7.2005, passed in C.W.J.C. No.1901 of 2005, whereby the lawful dues of the petitioner were directed to be paid to the petitioner within a period of two months providing details of calculation pending final disposal of C.WJ.C. 1901 of 2005. This writ petition has been disposed of by order dated 21.7.2010. In view of that order, no order is required to be passed in the present application. It is accordingly disposed of. Vinay/ ( S. K. Katriar ,J. )
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan