Case LawHigh Court › Engineering Co.(P) Ltd v. Deputy Commiss...

Engineering Co.(P) Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner

High Court 01 Aug 2006 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Engineering Co.(P) Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner
Date of order
01 Aug 2006
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Engineering Co.(P) Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner, the High Court (2006) dismissed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. Income Tax Appeal (L) No.255 of 2003 CIT Bombay .. .. Appellant v/s. ICICI Bank Ltd. .. .. Respondent Mr.A.M.Kotangale for appellant. Ms.Aarti Vissanji with Mr.S.J.Mehta for res. ---- CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE & V.R. KINGAONKAR, JJ. DATED : 1st August 2006 P.C. : 1. Heard Mr.Kotangale in support of this Appeal. Ms.Vissanji appears for the respondent. 2. The question sought to be raised is that the Appellate Tribunal ought not to have treated the dividend and income from house property as part of business activities and should not have granted deduction on that ground. This question has been covered by a a number of Division Bench judgments of this Court including one in Protos Protos Engineering Co.(P) Ltd. vs. Deputy Commissioner Engineering Co.(P) Ltd. vs. Deputy Commissionerof Income Tax reported in 203 CTR 445 wherein it of Income Tax reported in 203 CTR 445 has been held that the interest, rent and dividend form part of profits of eligible business for the purpose of working out deduction. There is no reason to entertain this Appeal. It is, therefore, dismissed. (H.L. GOKHALE, J.) (H.L. GOKHALE, J.) -2- (V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.) (V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan