Ess Kay Enterprises, Gohana Road, Panipat v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Karnal
High Court
04 Dec 2009 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Ess Kay Enterprises, Gohana Road, Panipat v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Karnal
Date of order
04 Dec 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Ess Kay Enterprises, Gohana Road, Panipat v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Karnal, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Issue: IV.Whether on the true and correct interpretation of the I.T.A.No.491 of 2009 2 provisions of sec.80HHC r.w.
Decision: In view of above, this appeal is dismissed, as no substantialquestion of law is arising from the impugned order.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
I.T.A.No.491 of 2009 2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Income Tax Appeal No.491 of 2009
Date of Decision:- 4.12.2009
ESS Kay Enterprises, Gohana Road, Panipat
---Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Income Tax, Karnal
---Respondent
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR
Present:-Mr.Devinder Kumar, Advocate for the appellant.SATISH KUMAR MITTAL, J.(ORAL)
The assessee has filed the instant appeal under section 260-Aof the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order dated 20.6.2008 passed bythe Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench (hereinafter referred to as“the ITAT”) in ITA No.944/DEL/2007, in the case of assessee for theAssessment Year 2003-2004, raising the following substantial questions oflaw:-
I. Whether the Duty draw back received is an amountderived and eligible for claim u/s 80IB?derived and eligible for claim u/s 80IB?
II. Whether the Tribunal order is sustainable being exparte
which is against the principles of justice for granting“opportunity” of being heard?“opportunity” of being heard?
III.Whether the Duty Entitlement Pass Book Schemereceived is an amount derived and eligible for claim u/sreceived is an amount derived and eligible for claim u/s
80IB?
IV.Whether on the true and correct interpretation of the
I.T.A.No.491 of 2009 2
provisions of sec.80HHC r.w. Section 80IA(9) r.w.Section 80IB(13) the Tribunal has erred in restricting theclaim of deductions under the Act?
Learned counsel for the assessee very fairly concedes that allthe aforesaid substantial questions have already been decided against theassessee by this Court in Liberty Indiav.Commissioner of Income Tax(2007) 293 ITR 520, which has been affirmed by the Hon'ble SupremeCourt of India in Liberty Indiav.Commissioner of Income Tax(2009)317 Income Tax Reports 218 (SC).
In view of above, this appeal is dismissed, as no substantialquestion of law is arising from the impugned order.
(Satish Kumar Mittal) Judge
4.12.2009AS
(Mehinder Singh Sullar) Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.